>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Notice of the General Office of the Supreme People's Court on Issuing Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases and 50 Typical Intellectual Property Cases Tried by Chinese Courts in 2017 [Effective]
最高人民法院办公厅关于印发2017年中国法院10大知识产权案件和50件典型知识产权案例的通知 [现行有效]
【法宝引证码】

Notice of the General Office of the Supreme People's Court on Issuing Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases and 50 Typical Intellectual Property Cases Tried by Chinese Courts in 2017 

最高人民法院办公厅关于印发2017年中国法院10大知识产权案件和50件典型知识产权案例的通知

(No. 66 [2018] of the General Office of the Supreme People's Court) (法办〔2018〕66号)

The higher people's courts of all Provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government; the Military Court of the People's Liberation Army; and the Production and Construction Corps Branch of the Higher People's Court of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous: 各省、自治区、直辖市高级人民法院,解放军军事法院,新疆维吾尔自治区高级人民法院生产建设兵团分院:
In 2017, under the firm leadership of the CPC Central Committee with comrade Xi Jinping as the core, people's courts adhered to the guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in a New Era, fully implemented the spirit of the 18th and 19th CPC National Congresses, faithfully fulfilled the duties vested by the Constitution and laws, firmly established the “Four Consciousnesses” , closely centered on the objective of "endeavoring to make the people feel equity and justice in every judicial case," gave full play of the leading role of judicial authorities in protecting intellectual property rights, continuously advanced the modernization of the intellectual property trial system and trial capabilities, and enhanced judicial credibility and international influence in the intellectual property field, so as to make positive contributions to the building of an intellectual property power and a science and technology power. In order to demonstrate the achievements of people's courts in judicial protection of intellectual property in a concentrated manner and give full play to the demonstrating and guiding role of typical cases, at the recommendation of all higher people's courts, based on the circumstances of the intellectual property cases decided by the Supreme People's Court in 2017, the Supreme People's Court selected top 10 intellectual property cases and 50 typical intellectual property cases tried by Chinese courts in 2017 in accordance with the relevant procedures. The lists of these cases and typical cases are hereby issued as the reference point for people's courts at all levels in intellectual property trials. 2017年,在以习近平同志为核心的党中央坚强领导下,人民法院坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导,全面贯彻落实党的十八大和十九大精神,忠实履行宪法法律赋予的职责,牢固树立“四个意识”,紧紧围绕“努力让人民群众在每一个司法案件中感受到公平正义”的工作目标,充分发挥司法保护知识产权的主导作用,不断推进知识产权审判体系和审判能力现代化,提升知识产权领域司法公信力和国际影响力,为建设知识产权强国和世界科技强国作出了积极贡献。为集中展示人民法院知识产权司法保护工作的成就,充分发挥典型案例的示范引导作用,经各高级人民法院推荐,并结合2017年最高人民法院审理的知识产权案件情况,最高人民法院依照相关程序选定了2017年中国法院10大知识产权案件和50件典型知识产权案例。现将这些案件和典型案例名单印发,供各级人民法院在知识产权审判工作中参考借鉴。
General Office of the Supreme People's Court 最高人民法院办公厅
April 16, 2018 2018年4月16日
Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases Tried by Chinese Courts in 2017 2017年中国法院10大知识产权案件
1. Guangdong Jiaduobao Drink & Food Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Wanglaoji Great Health Industry Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Pharmaceutical Holdings, Ltd. for Disputes over Unauthorized Use of Packaging or Decoration Peculiar to Famous Goods (Civil Judgment No. 2 and 3 [2015], Final, Civil Division 3, of the Supreme People's Court) 1.广东加多宝饮料食品有限公司与广州王老吉大健康产业有限公司、广州医药集团有限公司擅自使用知名商品特有包装装潢纠纷两案〔最高人民法院(2015)民三终字第2、3号民事判决书〕
2. Xixia Longcheng Special Materials Co., Ltd. v. Yulin Intellectual Property Office and Shannxi Coal and Chemical Industry Group Shenmu Tianyuan Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. for Administrative Resolution of Dispute over Patent Infringement (Administrative Judgment No. 84 [2017], Retrial, Administrative Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court) 2.西峡龙成特种材料有限公司与榆林市知识产权局、陕西煤业化工集团神木天元化工有限公司专利侵权纠纷行政处理案〔最高人民法院(2017)最高法行再84号行政判决书〕
3. Fuzhou Rice Mill v. Wuchang City Jinfutai Agriculture Co., Ltd. , Fuzhou Jinshandajingcheng Store of Fujian Xinhuadu Department Store Co., Ltd., and Fujian Xinhuadu Department Store Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Infringement of Trademark Rights (Civil Judgment No. 374 [2016], Retrial, Civil Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court) 3.福州米厂与五常市金福泰农业股份有限公司、福建新华都综合百货有限公司福州金山大景城分店、福建新华都综合百货有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2016)最高法民再374号民事判决书〕
4. The Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office v. Beijing Winsunny Harmony Science & Technology Co., Ltd. and Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited for Administrative Dispute over Invalidation of Patent for Invention (Administrative Judgment No. 41 [2016], Retrial, Administrative Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court Supreme) 4.国家知识产权局专利复审委员会与北京万生药业有限责任公司、第一三共株式会社发明专利权无效行政纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2016)最高法行再41号行政判决书〕
5. The Commercial Press v. Sinolingua Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition (Civil Judgment No. 277 [2016], First, Civil Division, 73, Beijing, of Beijing Intellectual Property Court) 5.商务印书馆有限公司与华语教学出版社有限责任公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案〔北京知识产权法院(2016)京73民初277号民事判决书〕
6. Shen Weining, Shen Danyan, and Shen Maiheng v. Nanjing Classic Auction Co., Ltd. and Zhang Hui for Dispute over Ownership of Copyright and Copyright Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 8048 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Jiangsu 01, of the Intermediate People's Court of Nanjing, Jiangsu Province) 6.沈韦宁、沈丹燕、沈迈衡与南京经典拍卖有限公司、张晖著作权权属、侵害著作权纠纷案〔江苏省南京市中级人民法院(2017)苏01民终8048号民事判决书〕
7. Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC. v. Guangzhou Fenli Foods Co., Ltd. and Wan Mingzheng for Dispute over Trademark Infringement(Civil Judgment No. 633 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Guangdong, of the Higher People's Court of Guangdong Province) 7.捷豹路虎有限公司与广州市奋力食品有限公司、万明政侵害商标权纠纷案〔广东省高级人民法院(2017)粤民终633号民事判决书〕
8. Sichuan Zhongzheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Bobai County Agricultural Science Research Institute in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Wang Tengjin, Liu Zhenzhuo, and Sichuan Zhongsheng Science and Technology Seed Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Infringement of New Plant Variety Rights (Civil Judgment No. 95 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Guangxi, of the Higher People's Court of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region) 8.四川中正科技有限公司与广西壮族自治区博白县农业科学研究所、王腾金、刘振卓、四川中升科技种业有限公司侵害植物新品种权纠纷案〔广西壮族自治区高级人民法院(2017)桂民终95号民事判决书〕
9. Hebi City Reflective Materials Co., Ltd. v. Song Junchao, Hebi Ruimingte Science and Technology Co., Ltd., and Li Jianfa for Dispute over Trade Secret Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 347 [2016], Final, Civil Division, Henan, of the Higher People's Court of Henan Province) 9.鹤壁市反光材料有限公司与宋俊超、鹤壁睿明特科技有限公司、李建发侵害商业秘密纠纷案〔河南省高级人民法院(2016)豫民终347号民事判决书〕
10. Beijing Yicha Infinite Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Yu Dong for Crime of Copyright Infringement (Criminal Judgment No. 12 [2015], First, Criminal Division (IP), Pudong, of the People's Court of Pudong New Area, Shanghai Municipality) 10.北京易查无限信息技术有限公司、于东侵犯著作权罪案〔上海市浦东新区人民法院(2015)浦刑(知)初字第12号刑事判决书〕
Fifty Typical Intellectual Property Cases Tried by Chinese Courts in 2017 2017年中国法院50件典型知识产权案例
I. Civil cases relating to intellectual property   一、知识产权民事案件
1. Cases of disputes over patent infringement and patent ownership (一)侵害专利权及专利权权属纠纷案件
(1) Tan Xining v. Zhenjiang New District Hengda Silicon Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Utility Model Patent and Design Patent (Civil Ruling No. 3712 [3712], Petition, Civil Division, of the Supreme People's Court) 1.谭熙宁与镇江新区恒达硅胶有限公司侵害实用新型与外观设计专利权纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2017)最高法民申3712号民事裁定书〕
(2) Nidec (Dongguan)Limited. v. LG Innotek Co., Ltd., and Beijing Zhongnan Shuanglu Technology Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Royalties in the Period of Provisional Patent Protection and Infringement of Patent for Invention (Civil Judgment No. 55 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Beijing, of the Higher People's Court of Beijing Municipality) 2.日本电产(东莞)有限公司与LG伊诺特有限公司、北京中南双绿科技有限公司发明专利临时保护期使用费和侵害发明专利权纠纷案〔北京市高级人民法院(2017)京民终55号民事判决书〕
(3) Tianjin Suiyide Environmental Protection Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. v. Suide Machinery (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Yang Hailong, Wang Hucheng, and Jia Yunpeng for Dispute over Patent Ownership (Civil Judgment No. 98 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Tianjin, of the Higher People's Court of Tianjin Municipality) 3.天津碎易得环保工程技术有限公司与碎得机械(北京)有限公司、杨海龙、王虎成、贾云鹏专利权权属纠纷案〔天津市高级人民法院(2017)津民终98号民事判决书〕
(4) Nanjing Medlander Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shi Zhihuai, Yang Ruijia, Zhou Gan, and Yang Dong v. Nanjing Vishee Medical Technology Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Patent Ownership (Civil Judgment No. 988 [2016], Final, Civil Division, Jiangsu, of the Higher People's Court of Jiangsu Province) 4.南京麦澜德医疗科技有限公司、史志怀、杨瑞嘉、周干、杨东与南京伟思医疗科技股份有限公司专利权权属纠纷案〔江苏省高级人民法院(2016)苏民终988号民事判决书〕
(5) Hangzhou Yongsun Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. v. Taizhou Xutian Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd., Shanghai Chaotian Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd., and Dongguan Xutian Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Infringement of Utility Model Patent (Civil Judgment No. 160 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Zhejiang, of the Higher People's Court of Zhejiang Province) 5.杭州永创智能设备股份有限公司与台州旭田包装机械有限公司、上海朝田包装机械有限公司、东莞市旭田包装机械有限公司侵害实用新型专利权纠纷案〔浙江省高级人民法院(2017)浙民终160号民事判决书〕
(6) Zhejiang Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Bosuer Motion Apparatus Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Infringement of Utility Model Patent (Civil Judgment No. 213 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Zhejiang, of the Higher People's Court of Zhejiang Province) 6.杭州骑客智能科技有限公司与浙江波速尔运动器械有限公司侵害实用新型专利权纠纷案〔浙江省高级人民法院(2017)浙民终213号民事判决书〕
(7) Rizhao Liying Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Rizhao Defu Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Infringement of Patent for Invention (Civil Judgment No. 890 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Shandong, of the Higher People's Court of Shandong Province) 7.日照市立盈机械制造有限公司与日照市德福机械制造有限公司侵害发明专利权纠纷案〔山东省高级人民法院(2017)鲁民终890号民事判决书〕
(8) Guangdong Level Intelligent Lock Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Guangdong Be-Tech Security System Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Infringement of Design Patent (Civil Judgment No. 1134 [2016], Final, Civil Division, Guangdong, of the Higher People's Court of Guangdong Province) 8.广东力维智能锁业有限公司与广东必达保安系统有限公司侵害外观设计专利权纠纷案〔广东省高级人民法院(2016)粤民终1134号民事判决书〕
(9) Philips Consumer Lifestyle B.V. v. Foshan City Shunde Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Infringement of Patent for Invention (Civil Judgment No. 1125 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Guangdong, of the Higher People's Court of Guangdong Province) 9.飞利浦优质生活有限公司与佛山市顺德区巨天电器有限公司侵害发明专利权纠纷案〔广东省高级人民法院(2017)粤民终1125号民事判决书〕
2. Cases of disputes over trademark infringement (二)侵害商标权纠纷案件
(10) Heze Huiyuan Canned Food Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Huiyuan Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition (Civil Judgment No. 7 [2015], Final, Civil Division 3, of the Supreme People's Court) 10.菏泽汇源罐头食品有限公司与北京汇源食品饮料有限公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2015)民三终字第7号民事判决书〕
(11) Taiyuan Daningtang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Shanxi Medical Material Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition (Civil Judgment No. 46 [2015], Review, Civil Division, of the Supreme People's Court) 11.太原大宁堂药业有限公司与山西省药材公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2015)民提字第46号民事判决书〕
(12) Cao Xiaodong v. Yunnan Xiaguan Tuocha Tea (Group) Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 273 [2017], Retrial, Civil Division, of the Supreme People's Court) 12.曹晓冬与云南下关沱茶(集团)股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2017)最高法民再273号民事判决书〕
(13) Guizhou Yonghong Food Co., Ltd. v. Guiyang Nanming Laoganma Food Co., Ltd. and Beijing Auchan Supermarket Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition (Civil Judgment No. 28 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Beijing, of the Higher People's Court of Beijing Municipality) 13.贵州永红食品有限公司与贵阳南明老干妈风味食品有限责任公司、北京欧尚超市有限公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案〔北京市高级人民法院(2017)京民终28号民事判决书〕
(14) Suofeiya Home Collection Co., Ltd. v. Lv Xiaolin, Yin Fengrong, and Nanyang Sofia Integrated Ceiling Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition (Civil Judgment No. 794 [2016], Final, Civil Division, Zhejiang, of the Higher People's Court of Zhejiang Province) 14.索菲亚家居股份有限公司与吕小林、尹丰荣、南阳市索菲亚集成吊顶有限公司侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案〔浙江省高级人民法院(2016)浙民终794号民事判决书〕
(15) Liu Yue v. Hefei Anzhisuan Cosmetics Co., Ltd., Hefei Anzhisuan Nutrient Hairdressing Management Co., Ltd., Beijing Yuqiritong Cosmetics Co., Ltd., and Beijing Wish Diana Cosmetics Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 525 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Anhui, of the Higher People's Court of Anhui Province) 15.刘悦与合肥市安之酸化妆品有限责任公司、合肥安之酸营养美发经营有限公司、北京御奇日通化妆品有限公司、北京韦氏?黛安娜化妆品有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案〔安徽省高级人民法院(2017)皖民终525号民事判决书〕
(16) Shanghai Aixinlu Trading Co., Ltd. v. Shandong Foreign Trade Taifeng Co., Ltd., Qingdao Zhengyitang Trading Co., Ltd., and Maikaile (Qingdao) Head Department Store Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 493 [2016], Final, Civil Division, Shandong, of the Higher People's Court of Shandong Province) 16.上海瑷馨露贸易有限公司与山东省对外贸易泰丰有限公司及青岛正颐堂贸易有限公司、麦凯乐(青岛)百货总店有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案〔山东省高级人民法院(2016)鲁民终493号民事判决书〕
(17) Guizhou Jiayou Online Co., Ltd. v. Jiayou Shopping Group Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 822 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Guizhou, of the Higher People's Court of Guizhou Province) 17.贵州家有在线网络有限公司与家有购物集团股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案〔贵州省高级人民法院(2017)黔民终822号民事判决书〕
(18) Domaines Barons De Rothschild (Lafite) v. Shanghai Mellowines Development Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Safe International Logistics Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 518 [2015], First, Civil Division, IP, Shanghai, of the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court) 18.拉菲罗斯柴尔德酒庄与上海保醇实业发展有限公司、保正(上海)供应链管理股份有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案〔上海知识产权法院(2015)沪知民初字第518号民事判决书〕
(19) Shantou Desheng Food Factory v. Jinan Huaiyin Jinfuguang Seasoning Dried Fruit Firm and Guangzhou Kangying Food Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 1856 [2016], First, Civil Division, 01, Shandong, of the Intermediate People's Court of Jinan, Shandong Province) 19.汕头市德生食品厂与济南槐荫金福广调味干果商行、广州康赢食品有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案〔山东省济南市中级人民法院(2016)鲁01民初1856号民事判决书〕
(20) Tian Renyue v. Zhangjiajie Yongding District Pangsao Dagupi Restaurant and Hu Jinying for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 18 [2017], First, Civil Division, 08, Hunan, of the Intermediate People's Court of Zhangjiajie, Hunan Province) 20.田任月与张家界市永定区胖嫂打鼓皮餐馆、胡金英侵害商标权纠纷案〔湖南省张家界市中级人民法院(2017)湘08民初18号民事判决书〕
(21) Colombia Sportswear Company v. Shihezi City Federal Adi Clothing Store for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 50 [2016], First, Civil Division, 08, Corps, of the Intermediate People's Court of the Eighth Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps) 21.哥伦比亚运动服装公司与石河子市联邦阿迪服装店侵害商标权纠纷案〔新疆生产建设兵团第八师中级人民法院(2016)兵08民初50号民事判决书〕
(22) Hennessy Company Based in French v. Penglai Liquor Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Trademark Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 17407 [2016], First, Civil Division, 0112, Chongqing, of the People's Court of Yubei District, Chongqing Municipality) 22.法国轩尼诗公司与蓬莱酒业有限公司侵害商标权纠纷案〔重庆市渝北区人民法院(2016)渝0112民初17407号民事判决书〕
(23) Zeng Hongyun v. DreamWorks Animation SKG. Inc. for Dispute over Domain Name Ownership and Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 4746 [2015], First, Civil Division, Siming, of the People's Court of Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian Province) 23.曾红云与梦工厂动画影片公司网络域名权属、侵权纠纷案〔福建省厦门市思明区人民法院(2015)思民初字第4746号民事判决书〕
3. Cases of disputes over copyright infringement (三)侵害著作权纠纷案件
(24) Shenzhen Feipengda Selected Products Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Beijing AVIC Zhicheng Technology Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Copyright Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 353 [2017], Retrial, Civil Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court) 24.深圳市飞鹏达精品制造有限公司与北京中航智成科技有限公司侵害著作权纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2017)最高法民再353号民事判决书〕
(25) Li Yanxia v. Jilin City Yongpeng Agricultural and Sideline Products Development Co., Ltd. and Nanguan District Benyuan Design Studio for Dispute over Copyright Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 2348[2017], Petition, Civil Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court) 25.李艳霞与吉林市永鹏农副产品开发有限公司、南关区本源设计工作室侵害著作权纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2017)最高法民申2348号民事裁定书〕
(26) Beijing Daidai Reading Books Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Founder Apabi Technology Co., Ltd. and National Library of China for Dispute over Copyright Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 26904 [2015], First, Civil Division (IP), Haidian, of the People's Court of Haidian District, Beijing Municipality) 26.北京代代读图书有限公司与北京方正阿帕比技术有限公司、国家图书馆侵害著作权纠纷案〔北京市海淀区人民法院(2015)海民(知)初字第26904号民事判决书〕
(27) Beijing Jinkaixing Technology Co., Ltd. v. Dalian Motor Vehicle Pollution Administration, Shenzhen Anche Testing Co., Ltd., and Dalian Environmental Protection Bureau for Dispute over Copyright Infringement in Computer Software (Civil Judgment No. 5082 [2016], Final, Civil Division, 02, Liaoning, of the Intermediate People's Court of Dalian, Liaoning Province) 27.北京金铠星科技有限公司与大连市机动车污染管理处、深圳市安车检测股份有限公司、大连市环境保护局侵害计算机软件著作权纠纷案〔辽宁省大连市中级人民法院(2016)辽02民终5082号民事判决书〕
(28) Baogao (Nanjing) Educational Toys Co., Ltd., Xihuashi (Nanjing) Technology Co., Ltd., and Jinjiang Dongxing Electronic Toys Co., Ltd. v. Nanjing Jinbaolai Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Infringement of Other Property Right in a Work (Civil Judgment No. 482 [2016], Final, Civil Division, Jiangsu, of the Higher People's Court of Jiangsu Province) 28.宝高(南京)教育玩具有限公司、熙华世(南京)科技有限公司、晋江市东兴电子玩具有限公司与南京金宝莱工贸有限公司侵害其他著作财产权纠纷案〔江苏省高级人民法院(2016)苏民终482号民事判决书〕
4. Cases of Disputes over Unfair Competition and Contracts (四)不正当竞争、合同纠纷案件
(29) Hebei Liurenkao Beverage Co., Ltd. v. Hebei Yangyuan Zhihui Beverage Co., Ltd. and Jinhua City Jindong District Ye Baosen Grocery for Dispute over Unauthorized Use of Packaging or Decoration Peculiar to Famous Goods (Civil Ruling No. 3918 [2017], Petition, Civil Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court) 29.河北六仁烤饮品有限公司与河北养元智汇饮品股份有限公司、金华市金东区叶保森副食店擅自使用知名商品特有包装装潢纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2017)最高法民申3918号民事裁定书〕
(30) Shaanxi-Based Baishui Dukang Liquor Co., Ltd. v. Luoyang Dukang Holdings Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Discrediting (Civil Judgment No. 154 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Shaanxi, of the Higher People's Court of Shaanxi Province) 30.陕西白水杜康酒业有限责任公司与洛阳杜康控股有限公司商业诋毁纠纷案〔陕西省高级人民法院(2017)陕民终154号民事判决书〕
(31) Harbin Fulong Food Brewing Plant v. Heilongjiang Province Kedong Fermented Bean Curd Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Unfair Competition (Civil Judgment No. 55 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Heilongjiang, of the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province) 31.哈尔滨市福龙食品酿造厂与黑龙江省克东腐乳有限公司不正当竞争纠纷案〔黑龙江高级人民法院(2017)黑民终55号民事判决书〕
(32) Wuxi Jingyuan Microelectronics Co., Ltd., Wuxi Youda Electronics Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen Yida Microelectronics Co., Ltd. v. NXP Semiconductors Co., Ltd., NXP Co., Ltd., NXP Semiconductors Netherlands Co., Ltd., NXP (China) Management Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Unauthorized Use of the Distinctive Name of Famous Goods (Civil Judgment No. 835 [2017], Final, Civil Division, 03, Guangdong, of the Intermediate People's Court of Shenzhen, Guangdong Province) 32.无锡市晶源微电子有限公司、无锡友达电子有限公司、深圳市亿达微电子有限公司与恩智浦半导体股份公司、NXP股份有限公司、恩智浦半导体荷兰有限公司、恩智浦(中国)管理有限公司擅自使用知名商品特有名称纠纷案〔广东省深圳市中级人民法院(2017)粤03民终835号民事判决书〕
(33) Beijing Wanyantong Software Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Qiaxingzhe Technology Co., Ltd., Shi Haotian, and Chen Hui for Dispute over Trade Secret Infringement (Civil Judgment No. 7465 [2016], First, Civil Division, 0108, Beijing, of the People's Court of Haidian District, Beijing Municipality) 33.北京万岩通软件有限公司与北京恰行者科技有限公司、石浩田、陈辉侵害商业秘密纠纷案〔北京市海淀区人民法院(2016)京0108民初7465号民事判决书〕
(34) Yangshuo County Dongyuan Mixiang Inn v. Yangshuo County Yushanju Inn and Zhang Chao for Dispute over Unauthorized Use of the Decoration Peculiar to Famous Goods (Civil Judgment No. 214 [2017], First, Civil Division, 0303, Guilin, of the People's Court of Diecai District, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region) 34.阳朔县东院弥香客栈与阳朔县玉山居客栈、张超擅自使用知名商品特有装潢纠纷案〔广西壮族自治区桂林市叠彩区人民法院(2017)桂0303民初214号民事判决书〕
(35) Xiao Yu Old Hot Pot in Yuzhong District and Lin Feng Xiao Yu Restaurant in Yubei District for Dispute over Unfair Competition (Civil Judgment No. 7238 [2017], First, Civil Division, 0112, Chongqing, of the People's Court of Yubei District, Chongqing Municipality) 35.渝中区晓宇老火锅与渝北区林峰晓宇餐饮店不正当竞争纠纷案〔重庆市渝北区人民法院(2017)渝0112民初7238号民事判决书〕
(36) Tianjin That's Life Culture Dissemination Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Kelan Trading Co., Ltd. for Dispute over an Intellectual Property Contract (Civil Judgment No. 489 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Tianjin, of the Higher People's Court of Tianjin Municipality) 36.天津那是生活文化传播有限公司与上海珂兰商贸有限公司知识产权合同纠纷案〔天津市高级人民法院(2017)津民终489号民事判决书〕
(37) Chongqing Zuxia Software Vocational Training Academy v. Mao Zhigang for Contract Dispute (Civil Judgment No. 3840 [2017], First, Civil Division, 0106, Chongqing, of the People's Court of Shapingba District, Chongqing Municipality) 37.重庆市足下软件职业培训学院与毛志刚合同纠纷案〔重庆市沙坪坝区人民法院(2017)渝0106民初3840号民事判决书〕
5. Disputes over infringement of new plant variety rights, monopoly, and liability for damage arising from intellectual property litigation (五)侵害植物新品种权、垄断及知识产权诉讼损害责任纠纷
(38) Nantong City Grain and Cotton Stock Farm v. Jiangsu Gaoke Seed Technology Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Claim for Compensation for New Plant Variety (Civil Judgment No. 58 [2017], Final, Civil Division, Jiangsu, of the Higher People's Court of Jiangsu Province) 38.南通市粮棉原种场与江苏省高科种业科技有限公司植物新品种追偿权纠纷案〔江苏省高级人民法院(2017)苏民终58号民事判决书〕
(39) Wang Danyang v. Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Abuse of Market Power (Civil Judgment No. 8 [2015], First, IP Division, Harbin, of the Intermediate People's Court of Harbin, Heilongjiang Province) 39.王丹阳与北京百度网讯科技有限公司滥用市场支配地位纠纷案〔黑龙江省哈尔滨市中级人民法院(2015)哈知初字第8号民事判决书〕
(40) Sino Legend (China) Chemical Co. Ltd. v. SI Group-Shanghai Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Liability for Damage Arising from Intellectual Property Litigation Brought in Bath Faith (Civil Judgment No. 501 [2016], Final, Civil Division, Shanghai, of the Higher People's Court of Shanghai Municipality) 40.华奇(中国)化工有限公司与圣莱科特化工(上海)有限公司恶意提起知识产权诉讼损害责任纠纷案〔上海市高级人民法院(2016)沪民终501号民事判决书〕
II. Administrative cases relating to intellectual property   二、知识产权行政案件
1. Administrative cases relating to patents (一)专利行政案件
(41) Sensing Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office and Ningbo Xunqiang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. for Administrative Dispute over Invalidation of Patent for Invention (Administrative Judgment No. 19 [2016], Retrial, Administrative Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court Supreme) 41.传感电子有限责任公司与国家知识产权局专利复审委员会、宁波讯强电子科技有限公司发明专利权无效行政纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2016)最高法行再19号行政判决书〕
(42) Liu Changshou, Zhou Wentao, and Liu Xiang v. Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office for Administrative Dispute over Reexamination of Rejection of Application for Utility Model Patent (Administrative Ruling No. 5980 [2017], Petition, Administrative Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court Supreme) 42.刘长寿、周闻涛、刘翔与国家知识产权局专利复审委员会实用新型专利申请驳回复审行政纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2017)最高法行申5980号行政裁定书〕
(43) Wuxi Intellectual Property Office v. Jiangyin Chenghua Investment Development Co., Ltd. and Wuxi Hongxing Signs Co., Ltd. for Disposition Decision on Dispute over Patent Infringement (Administrative Judgment No. 610 [2017], Final, Administrative Division, Jiangsu, of the Higher People's Court of Jiangsu Province) 43.无锡市知识产权局与江阴澄华投资发展有限公司、无锡市红光标牌有限公司专利侵权纠纷处理决定案〔江苏省高级人民法院(2017)苏行终610号行政判决书〕
2. Administrative cases relating to trademarks (二)商标行政案件
(44) Michael Jeffrey Jordan v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and Qiaodan Sports Co., Ltd. for Administrative Dispute over Trademark (Administrative Ruling No. 332 [2015], IP and Administrative Division, of the Supreme People's Court Supreme) 44.迈克尔?杰弗里?乔丹与国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会、乔丹体育股份有限公司商标争议行政纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2015)知行字第332号行政裁定书〕
(45) Wuliangye Group Co., Ltd. in Yibin, Sichuan v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and Gansu Binhe Food Industry (Group) Co., Ltd. for Administrative Dispute over Review of Trademark Opposition (Administrative Ruling No. 37 [2014], IP and Administrative Division, of the Supreme People's Court Supreme) 45.四川省宜宾五粮液集团有限公司与国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会、甘肃滨河食品工业(集团)有限责任公司商标异议复审行政纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2014)知行字第37号行政裁定书〕
(46) Wenzhou Yijiuliang Optics Co., Ltd. v. Dama Co., Ltd. and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce for Administrative Dispute over Claim for Declaration of Trademark Invalidation (Administrative Ruling No. 7174 [2017], Petition, Administrative Division, SPC, of the Supreme People's Court Supreme) 46.温州市伊久亮光学有限公司与达马股份有限公司、国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会商标权无效宣告请求行政纠纷案〔最高人民法院(2017)最高法行申7174号行政裁定书〕
(47) Anhui Guorun Tea Co., Ltd. v. Qimen County Qimen Black Tea Association and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce for Administrative Dispute over Claim for Declaration of Trademark Invalidaiton (Administrative Judgment No. 3288 [2017], Final, Administrative Division, Beijing, of the Higher People's Court of Beijing Municipality) 47.安徽国润茶业有限公司与祁门县祁门红茶协会、国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会商标权无效宣告请求行政纠纷案〔北京市高级人民法院(2017)京行终3288号行政判决书〕
3. Other administrative case (三)其他行政案件
(48) Jaguar Land Rover (China) Investment Co., Ltd. v. Supervision and Administration Bureau of Pudong New District, Shanghai Municipality and the People's Government of Pudong New District, Shanghai Municipality for Decision of Administrative Reconsideration (Administrative Judgment No. 291 [2017], First, Administrative Division, 0115, Shanghai, of the People's Court of Pudong New Area, Shanghai Municipality) 48.捷豹路虎(中国)投资有限公司与上海市浦东新区市场监督管理局、上海市浦东新区人民政府行政复议决定案〔上海市浦东新区人民法院(2017)沪0115行初291号行政判决书〕
III. Criminal cases relating to intellectual property   三、知识产权刑事案件
(49) Hefei Guoyao Electronics Co., Ltd. and Zhong Chuanrui for the Crime of Sale of Counterfeit Goods Infringing Registered Trademarks (Criminal Judgment No. 56 [2017], First, Criminal Division, 0191, Anhui, of the People's Court of Hefei High and New Technology Development Zone, Ahui Province) 49.合肥市国耀电子有限公司、钟传锐销售假冒注册商标的商品罪案〔安徽省合肥高新技术产业开发区人民法院(2017)皖0191刑初56号刑事判决书〕
(50) Chen Yiquan and Three Other Persons for the Crime of Trade Secret Infringement (Criminal Judgment No. 2539 [2016], First, Criminal Division, 0307, Guangdong, of the People's Court of Longgang District, Shenzhen, Ahui Province) 50.陈奕泉等四人侵犯商业秘密罪案〔广东省深圳市龙岗区人民法院(2016)粤0307刑初2539号刑事判决书〕
An Introduction to Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases Tried by Chinese Courts in 2017 2017年中国法院10大知识产权案件简介
1. Wanglaoji v. Jiaduobao for Dispute over Packaging or Decoration Peculiar to Famous Goods 1.王老吉加多宝知名商品特有包装装潢纠纷案
Guangdong Jiaduobao Drink & Food Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Wanglaoji Great Health Industry Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Ltd. for Disputes over Unauthorized Use of Packaging or Decoration Peculiar to Famous Goods (Civil Judgment No. 2 and 3 [2015], Final, Civil Division 3, of the Supreme People's Court) 广东加多宝饮料食品有限公司与广州王老吉大健康产业有限公司、广州医药集团有限公司擅自使用知名商品特有包装装潢纠纷两案〔最高人民法院(2015)民三终字第2、3号民事判决书〕
[Case Summary] On July 6, 2012, Guangzhou Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "GP Holdings") and Guangdong Jiaduobao Drink & Food Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "JDB Company") instituted legal proceedings in a court respectively, each asserting its interests in the packaging or decoration peculiar to the famous goods: "Red-Canned Wanglaoji Herbal Tea," for which each alleged that the packaging or decoration of the red-canned herbal tea produced and sold by the other constituted infringement. The court of first instance held that the interests in "Red-Canned Wanglaoji Herbal Tea" should belong to GP Holdings and that the production and sale of red-canned herbal tea by Guangzhou Wanglaoji Great Health Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Health Company") with the authority of the GP Holdings did not constitute infringement. Owing to the fact that JDB Company had no interests in the case-related packaging or decoration, its production and sale of both red-canned herbal tea with marks "王老吉" and "加多宝" on either side and that with marks "加多宝" on two sides constituted infringement. Hence, the court of first instance ordered JDB Company to cease the infringement, publish a statement to eliminate the impact, and compensate GP Holdings for CNY150 million in financial loss and more than CNY260,000 in reasonable enforcement costs and dismissed the claims of JDB Company. JDB Company appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance to the Supreme People's Court. The Supreme People's Court held in the final judgment that the famous goods in the case were "Red-Canned Wanglaoji Herbal Tea" and that the can of the Red-Canned Wanglaoji Herbal Tea as its entirety including "the yellow scripts: 王老吉, red backdrop and other colors, patterns, a combination of the aforesaid, and other integral components was packaging or decoration peculiar to famous goods. Both GP Holdings and JDB Company asserted their interests in the packaging or decoration peculiar to red-canned Wanglaoji herbal tea, in relation to which the Supreme People's Court held that taking into account the history of red-canned Wanglaoji herbal tea, cooperation background between the parties, popularity among consumers, and the principle of equity, on account of the positive role of GP Holdings and its predecessor and that of JDB Company and its affiliates in the arising and development of the interests in the packaging or decoration and the establishment of goodwill, it would result in unconscionability and might cause damage to public interests to award the interests in the packaging or decoration in its entirety to either party. Hence, the interests in the packaging or decoration peculiar to the case-related famous goods might, on the premise of compliance with the principle of good faith and respect for consumers' understanding, without prejudice to the lawful interests of others, be shared by GP Holdings and JDB Company. For that reason, the allegation of either GP Holdings or JDB Company that the production and sale of red-canned herbal tea by the other constituted unauthorized use of the packaging or decoration peculiar to its famous goods was untenable, and the claims of GP Holdings and JDB Company were dismissed. 【案情摘要】2012年7月6日,广州医药集团有限公司(以下简称广药集团)与广东加多宝饮料食品有限公司(以下简称加多宝公司)分别向法院提起诉讼,均主张享有“红罐王老吉凉茶”知名商品特有包装装潢的权益,并据此指控对方生产销售的红罐凉茶商品的包装装潢构成侵权。一审法院认为,“红罐王老吉凉茶”包装装潢的权益享有者应为广药集团,广州王老吉大健康产业有限公司(以下简称大健康公司)经广药集团授权生产销售的红罐凉茶不构成侵权。由于加多宝公司不享有涉案包装装潢权益,故其生产销售的一面“王老吉”、一面“加多宝”和两面“加多宝”的红罐凉茶均构成侵权。一审法院遂判令加多宝公司停止侵权行为,刊登声明消除影响,并赔偿广药集团经济损失1.5亿元及合理维权费用26万余元,同时驳回加多宝公司的诉讼请求。加多宝公司不服两案一审判决,向最高人民法院提起上诉。最高人民法院终审判决认为,本案中的知名商品为“红罐王老吉凉茶”,在红罐王老吉凉茶产品的罐体上包括“黄色王老吉文字、红色底色等色彩、图案及其排列组合等组成部分在内的整体内容”,为知名商品特有包装装潢。广药集团与加多宝公司均主张对红罐王老吉凉茶的特有包装装潢享有权益,最高人民法院对此认为,结合红罐王老吉凉茶的历史发展过程、双方的合作背景、消费者的认知及公平原则的考量,因广药集团及其前身、加多宝公司及其关联企业,均对涉案特有包装装潢权益的形成、发展和商誉建树,各自发挥了积极的作用,将涉案特有包装装潢权益完全判归一方所有,均会导致显失公平的结果,并可能损及社会公众利益。因此,涉案知名商品特有包装装潢权益,在遵循诚实信用原则和尊重消费者认知并不损害他人合法权益的前提下,可由广药集团与加多宝公司共同享有。在此基础上,广药集团与加多宝公司相互指控对方生产销售的红罐凉茶商品构成擅自使用他人知名商品特有包装装潢的主张,均不能成立,对广药集团及加多宝公司的诉讼请求均予以驳回。
...... ......

Dear visitor, you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases. If you are not a subscriber, you can pay for a document through Online Pay and read it immediately after payment.
An entity user can apply for a trial account or contact us for your purchase.
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com

 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容;
单位用户可申请试用或者来电咨询购买。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:database@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese