|
|
|
No. 1 of Trial of Five Typical Cases on Food and Pharmaceutical Product Dispute Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Sun Yinshan v. Jiangning Store of Nanjing Auchan Supermarket Co., Ltd. (Sales contract dispute)
|
|
最高人民法院公布五起审理食品药品纠纷典型案例之一：孙银山诉南京欧尚超市有限公司江宁店买卖合同纠纷案
|
|
|
|
No. 1 of Trial of Five Typical Cases on Food and Pharmaceutical Product Dispute Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Sun Yinshan v. Jiangning Store of Nanjing Auchan Supermarket Co., Ltd. (Sales contract dispute)
(Sales contract dispute)
最高人民法院公布五起审理食品药品纠纷典型案例之一：孙银山诉南京欧尚超市有限公司江宁店买卖合同纠纷案
|
|
[核心术语]
消费者;食品安全标准;十倍赔偿;买卖合同
|
|
[争议焦点]
1.消费者明知其所购买的食品不符合食品安全标准的，能否要求食品销售者或者生产者十倍赔偿？
|
|
[案例要旨]
消费者是相对于销售者和生产者的概念指的是按个人目的购买或使用商品和接受服务的社会成员。我国消费者的权益受《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》保护在市场交易中购买、使用商品或者接受服务是为了个人、家庭生活需要的就属于我国消费者权益保护法调整的范围。我国《食品安全法》规定了食品销售者负有保证食品安全的法定义务。生产者生产不符合食品安全标准的食品或者销售者销售明知是不符合食品安全标准的食品...
|
| No. 1 of Trial of Five Typical Cases on Food and Pharmaceutical Product Dispute Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Sun Yinshan v. Jiangning Store of Nanjing Auchan Supermarket Co., Ltd. (Sales contract dispute) | | 最高人民法院公布五起审理食品药品纠纷典型案例之一：孙银山诉南京欧尚超市有限公司江宁店买卖合同纠纷案 |
| 1. Basic Facts | | （一）基本案情 |
| On May 1, 2012, Plaintiff Sun Yinshan purchased 15 bags of “Yutu” sausage from Defendant Jiangning Store of Auchan Supermarket Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Auchan Supermarket”) and the warranty period of 14 bags of sausage valued at 558.6 yuan has expired (which was known by the Plaintiff). After having paid the bill at the checkout counter, Sun Yinshan went straight to the service counter to claim for compensation. Since negotiation failed, Sun Yinshan brought a lawsuit in the People's Court of Jiangning District, Nanjing City and required Auchan Supermarket to compensate him 5,586 yuan, which was ten times of the money he paid. | | 2012年5月1日，原告孙银山在被告欧尚超市有限公司江宁店（以下简称欧尚超市）购买“玉兔牌”香肠15包，其中价值558.6元的14包香肠已过保质期（原告明知）。孙银山到收银台结账后，又径直到服务台进行索赔。因协商未果，孙银山诉至南京市江宁区人民法院，要求欧尚超市支付售价十倍的赔偿金5586元。 |
| ．．．．．． | | （二）裁判结果 |
| | 法院认为，消费者权益保护法第2条规定：“消费者为生活消费需要购买、使用商品或者接受服务，其权益受本法保护；本法未作规定的，受其他有关法律、法规保护。”本案中，孙银山实施了购买商品的行为，欧尚超市未提供证据证明其购买商品是用于生产销售，并且原告孙银山因购买到过期食品而要求索赔，属于行使法定权利。因此欧尚超市认为孙银山不是消费者的抗辩理由不能成立。 |
| | ．．．．．． |
|
Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.
1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.
2. Binding to the account with access to this database.
3. Apply for a trial account.
4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【￥200.00】 for your single purchase. | |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户；您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买，支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
|
|
|
|
|
|