>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Guilin Asoo Technology Co., Ltd. v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry & Commerce et al. (case of administrative dispute over review of opposition against trademark registration)
桂林埃索技术有限公司诉国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会等公司商标异议复审行政纠纷案
【法宝引证码】
*尊敬的用户,您好!本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务,如需整篇翻译,请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com,或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com

Guilin Asoo Technology Co., Ltd. v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry & Commerce et al. (case of administrative dispute over review of opposition against trademark registration)
(case of administrative dispute over review of opposition against trademark registration)
桂林埃索技术有限公司诉国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会等公司商标异议复审行政纠纷案
[Key Terms]
prior rights ; copyright ; disputed trademark ; scope of protection
[核心术语]
在先权利;著作权;诉争商标;保护范围
[Disputed Issues]
When the copyright is protected as a prior right in the Trademark Law, the scope of protection shall be limited.
[争议焦点]
当著作权作为商标法中的在先权利予以保护时,应当对其保护范围予以限制。
[Case Summary]
Where a party claims that a disputed trademark infringes upon his or her prior copyright the people's court shall conduct the examination in accordance with the Copyright Law and other relevant provisions. However given that the copyright is a special type of right with a relatively long protection term and covering relatively wide scope of right protection...
[案例要旨]
当事人主张诉争商标损害其在先著作权时人民法院应当依照著作权法等相关规定进行审查。但是鉴于著作权是一种比较特殊的权利类型...

Full-text Omitted.

 

桂林埃索技术有限公司诉国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会等公司商标异议复审行政纠纷案

 中华人民共和国最高人民法院
 行政裁定书
 (2016)最高法行申375号
 再审申请人(一审原告、二审上诉人):桂林埃索技术有限公司。
 法定代表人:张正志,该公司经理。
 委托诉讼代理人:徐飞,广西伏波律师事务所律师。
 被申请人(一审被告、二审被上诉人):国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会。
 法定代表人:赵刚,该委员会主任。
 委托诉讼代理人:贾玉竹,该委员会审查员。
 被申请人(一审第三人、二审被上诉人):米高梅公司(METRO-GLODWYN-MAYERLIONCORP.)。
 法定代表人:迈克尔·B·摩尔,该公司高级副总裁。
 委托诉讼代理人:客迎伏,北京如阳律师事务所律师。
 委托诉讼代理人:唐红兵,北京如阳律师事务所实习律师。
 ......

Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥200.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese