|
|
|
No. 5 of Ten Noteworthy Financial Cases in Shanghai Courts of 2018: The Agreement between Parties cannot be Relied on to Defend against the Record in the Electronic Commercial Draft System - An appellant case of Security Company A v. Factoring Company B, Company C and Company D on Disputes over Right of Recourse
|
|
2018年度上海法院金融商事审判十大案例之五：甲证券公司与乙保理公司、丙公司、丁公司等票据追索权纠纷上诉案——当事人的约定不能对抗电子商业汇票系统中的记载
|
|
|
|
No. 5 of Ten Noteworthy Financial Cases in Shanghai Courts of 2018: The Agreement between Parties cannot be Relied on to Defend against the Record in the Electronic Commercial Draft System - An appellant case of Security Company A v. Factoring Company B, Company C and Company D on Disputes over Right of Recourse
2018年度上海法院金融商事审判十大案例之五：甲证券公司与乙保理公司、丙公司、丁公司等票据追索权纠纷上诉案——当事人的约定不能对抗电子商业汇票系统中的记载
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. 5 of Ten Noteworthy Financial Cases in Shanghai Courts of 2018: The Agreement between Parties cannot be Relied on to Defend against the Record in the Electronic Commercial Draft System - An appellant case of Security Company A v. Factoring Company B, Company C and Company D on Disputes over Right of Recourse | | 2018年度上海法院金融商事审判十大案例之五：甲证券公司与乙保理公司、丙公司、丁公司等票据追索权纠纷上诉案——当事人的约定不能对抗电子商业汇票系统中的记载 |
| [Gist] | | 【裁判要旨】 |
| The parties at issue signed an agreement stipulating that the pledgee registered in the Electronic Commercial Draft (“ECD”) system shall hold relevant ECD as the agent of the actual pledgee. Pursuant to the Law of Negotiable Instruments, the pledgee recognized by law shall the one registered in the ECD system instead of the actual pledgee as agreed by the parties. The agreement between parties are not allowed to override the literalness of negotiable instruments. | | 各方当事人签订协议，约定电子商业汇票系统中载明的质权人作为实际质权人的代理人在电子商业汇票系统中持有票据。根据票据法的规定，此时应认定质权人为电子商业汇票系统所载明的人，而不是当事人自行约定、未在电子商业汇票系统中载明的人。当事人的约定不能突破票据的文义性特征。 |
| ．．．．．． | | 【基本案情】 |
| | 2016年1月，丙公司与丁公司签订《购货合同》，约定丙公司向丁公司购买铜精矿等。同年4月1日，丙公司作为出票人和承兑人开具电子商业承兑汇票一张，载明收款人为丁公司，票据金额为99，995，447.20元，到期日为2017年3月21日。2016年3月，丁公司与乙保理公司签订《应收账款转让合同》，约定丁公司将其对丙公司享有的应收账款债权转让给乙保理公司。同年4月，丁公司将系争电子商业承兑汇票背书转让给乙保理公司。 |
| | 之后，乙保理公司与甲证券公司签订《资产买卖协议》，约定乙保理公司将包括上述99，995，447.20元债权在内的若干项资产转让给甲证券公司。双方又签订《票据质押协议》，约定乙保理公司以系争汇票设定质押，作为丙公司履行货款支付义务的担保。甲证券公司、乙保理公司还与戊银行签订《票据服务协议》，约定乙保理公司将系争汇票出质给甲证券公司，戊银行作为票据服务银行和质权人的代理人，在电子商业汇票系统中持有票据，并提供质押票据的审验、保管和提示付款等服务。在电子商业汇票系统中，质权人登记为戊银行。2017年3月21日，戊银行就系争汇票进行提示付款，因承兑人账户余额不足被拒付。 |
| | ．．．．．． |
|
Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.
1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.
2. Binding to the account with access to this database.
3. Apply for a trial account.
4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【￥200.00】 for your single purchase. | |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户；您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买，支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
|
|
|
|
|
|