>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Royal Food Import Corp. v Ningbo Youngor International Trade & Transportation Co.,Ltd. (case of dispute over the application for retrial of sales contract)
皇家食品进口公司与宁波雅戈尔国际贸易运输有限公司买卖合同纠纷申请案
【法宝引证码】

Royal Food Import Corp. v Ningbo Youngor International Trade & Transportation Co.,Ltd. (case of dispute over the application for retrial of sales contract) 

皇家食品进口公司与宁波雅戈尔国际贸易运输有限公司买卖合同纠纷申请案

The Intermediate People's Court of Ningbo, Zhejiang Province (8 November 2013) 浙江省宁波市中级人民法院
Civil Ruling 民事裁定书
2012 Zhe Yongzhong Quezi No.3 (2012)浙甬仲确字第3号
Claimant: Royal Food Import Corp. 申请人:皇家食品进口公司。
Legal Representative: Collin Tuthill 法定代表人:CollinTuthill。
Attorney: Yuan Bing 委托代理人:袁斌。
Attorney: Wen Li 委托代理人:温莉。
Respondent: Ningbo Youngor International Trade & Transportation Co.Ltd 被申请人:宁波雅戈尔国际贸易运输有限公司。
Legal Representative: Zhou Jule 法定代表人:周巨乐。
Attorney: Sun Xi 委托代理人:孙晞。
Attorney: Xu Ruchun 委托代理人:许如春。
On 26 July 2011, the US Association of Food Industry (“AFI”) rendered an award on the dispute over a sale contract between Royal Food Import Corp. (“Royal”) and Ningbo Youngor International Trade & Transportation Co. Ltd (“Youngor”). On 14 September 2012, Royal applied to the Court to recognize and enforce the award. After accepting the case on 14 September 2012, the Court duly constituted a collegial bench and heard the case. Now the case is closed. 申请人皇家食品进口公司(以下简称皇家公司)与被申请人宁波雅戈尔国际贸易运输有限公司(以下简称雅戈尔公司)买卖合同纠纷一案,美国食品工业协会于2011年7月26日作出仲裁裁决。2012年9月14日,皇家公司向本院提出申请,请求承认和执行该仲裁裁决。本院于2012年9月14日立案受理后,依法组成合议庭审理了本案。本案现已审理终结。
Basic Facts 基本案情
Royal claimed that: on 4 August 2009, the Applicant concluded with the Respondent a purchase confirmation No. Master-ACT (“Purchase Confirmation”)and agreed that the Applicant would purchase from the Respondent 143,136 boxes of green beans for the FOB price of USD 9.95/box. The parties agreed that any dispute arising out of the Purchase Confirmation should be referred to arbitration by the AFI in New Jersey, USA. Thereafter, the parties actually performed the contract. Royal made the payment according to the contract and Youngor delivered the goods between October 2009 and March 2010. However, after examination, it was found that the quality of the goods failed to meet the standard and that the goods were not suitable for human consumption. Therefore, the Applicant filed a request for arbitration with the AFI. The Respondent subsequently filed a lawsuit against the Applicant with the US District Court of New Jersey and applied for an injunction to halt the AFI arbitration proceedings on the ground that there was no arbitration agreement between the parties. Later on, the Respondent agreed to withdraw its lawsuit against the Applicant and agreed to refer to arbitration the above dispute relating to the Purchase Confirmation. On 26 July 2011, the AFI arbitral tribunal rendered an award No. 2544 and ordered Respondent to pay USD 560,250.61 to the Applicant. The Applicant therefore requests the court to recognize and enforce the award pursuant to the relevant provisions of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“New York Convention”) and the Civil Procedure Law of the PRC , and to rule that the Respondent shall pay to the Applicant the amount of USD 560,250.61 under the award as well as the interest calculated from 27 July 2011 to the date of actual payment, at the annual rate of 7%. 申请人皇家公司称:2009年8月4日,申请人和被申请人签订编号为Master-ACT的购买确认书一份,约定申请人向被申请人购买143136箱青豆,价格为FOB9.95美元/箱。双方约定一切因购买确认书引起的任何争执应递交位于美国新泽西州的美国食品工业协会裁决。之后双方实际履行了合同,申请人按合同支付货款,被申请人在2009年10月至2010年3月期间陆续交付了货物。然而经检验交付的货物品质不达标,不适宜人类食用,为此申请人向美国食品工业协会提出仲裁。被申请人之后向美国新泽西州地区法院提起民事诉讼并申请禁令,以双方不存在仲裁协议为由要求停止在美国食品工业协会的仲裁程序。后被申请人同意撤销其针对申请人提起的诉讼并同意将上述因购买确认书引起的争议提交仲裁。2011年7月26日,美国食品工业协会仲裁庭作出案号为某2544的仲裁裁决,裁定被申请人向申请人支付560250.61美元。故依照《承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》(以下简称《纽约公约》)和《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的有关规定向本院请求承认和执行该裁决,并裁定被申请人向申请人支付仲裁裁决项下的金额560250.61美元及2011年7月27日至实际支付之日止按年利率7%计算的利息。
...... 被申请人雅戈尔公司辩称:申请人未提供包含仲裁条款的合同原件,不符合《纽约公约》四条规定。申请人提出的承认和执行仲裁裁决申请所依据的事实是虚构的,涉案合同是申请人伪造的。合同上的供应商既是DesionLi,又是被申请人,被申请人没有接受过DesionLi的委托。被申请人代理工厂与申请人发生几笔业务,但不是涉案合同项下的货物。被申请人收到仲裁通知的第一时间就向美国食品工业协会声明合同是伪造的,但是美国食品工业协会和美国新泽西州地区法院无视被申请人声明,依据申请人提供的虚假合同作出仲裁裁决。申请人所提供的美国新泽西州地区法院的裁决书在我国是不足以证明相关事实的。请求依法不予承认和执行美国食品工业协会的仲裁裁决。
 ......

Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥300.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese