>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Environmental Protection Association of Ganyu District, Lianyungang City v. Wang Shengjie (Public interest litigation about compensation for damage of environmental pollution)
连云港市赣榆区环境保护协会诉王升杰环境污染损害赔偿公益诉讼案
【法宝引证码】

Environmental Protection Association of Ganyu District, Lianyungang City v. Wang Shengjie (Public interest litigation about compensation for damage of environmental pollution)
(Public interest litigation about compensation for damage of environmental pollution)
连云港市赣榆区环境保护协会诉王升杰环境污染损害赔偿公益诉讼案
Environmental Protection Association of Ganyu District, Lianyungang City v. Wang Shengjie (Public interest litigation about compensation for damage of environmental pollution) 连云港市赣榆区环境保护协会诉王升杰环境污染损害赔偿公益诉讼案
[Judgment Abstract] [裁判摘要]
Any person causing environmental pollution hazard shall be liable for eliminating such hazard. Without permit, the actor illegally discharging industrial waste acid to the river, causing environmental pollution shall assume the obligation of conducting remediation of the polluted environment so as to eliminate the harms already caused. In order to reach the ultimate goal of the most scientific and rational remediation of the polluted environment, the court may provide professional technical support by means of argumentation in court by the expert witness. When the actor has inadequate solvency, the remediation costs may be determined by reference to the national standard for wages of employees. According to the purpose of environmental legislation of “whoever emits pollution shall carry out prevention and control and whoever destroys the environment shall make compensation,” the actor shall be required to make up damage to the environment caused by himself by providing labor that is good for the environmental protection. 造成环境污染危害者,有责任排除危害。行为人未经许可将工业废酸违法排放到河流中,造成环境污染,应当承担修复受污染环境的责任以排除已经造成的危害。为了达到使被污染环境得到最科学合理的恢复这一最终目标,法院可以采取专家证人当庭论证的方式提供专业技术支持。当行为人的经济赔偿能力不足时,可以参照目前全国职工日工资标准确定修复费用,按照“谁污染,谁治理,谁损害,谁赔偿”的环境立法宗旨,要求行为人通过提供有益于环境保护的劳务活动抵补其对环境造成的损害。

BASIC FACTS
 
Plaintiff: Environmental Protection Association of Ganyu District, Lianyungang City, domiciled in Qindao Road, Qingkou Township, Yugan District, Lianyungang City. 原告:连云港市赣榆区环境保护协会。
Legal Representative: Xu Changping, President of this Association. 法定代表人:徐长平,该会会长。
Organ Supporting Litigation: People's Procuratorate of Lianyungang City, domiciled in Chaoyang East Road, Xinpu District, Lianyungang City. 支持起诉机关:连云港市人民检察院。
Legal Representative: Wang Yue, Chief Prosecutor of this Procuratorate. 法定代表人:汪跃,该院检察长。
Defendant: Wang Shengjie, male, 43 years old, Chinese Han, domiciled in Ganyu District, Lianyungang City. 被告王升杰。
Plaintiff, Environmental Protection Association of Ganyu District, Lianyungang City (hereinafter referred to as “Environmental Protection Association of Ganyu District”), filed a public interest litigation about compensation for damage of environmental pollution with the Intermediate People's Court of Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province against defendant Wang Shengjie. 原告连云港市赣榆区环境保护协会 (以下简称赣榆环保协会)诉被告王升杰环境污染损害赔偿公益诉讼一案,诉至江苏省连云港市中级人民法院。
...... 原告赣榆环保协会诉称:2012年下半年以来,被告王升杰在连云港市赣榆区石桥镇石岭村石英石加工厂内,在酸洗池中使用盐酸清洗石英石,将酸洗过程中产生的含酸废水通过渗坑排放至连云港市赣榆区龙北干渠,导致龙北干渠及与其相连的芦沟河受到污染。王升杰先后排放含酸废水100余吨,造成河流污染,破坏环境,损害了公共利益,应赔偿整治河流的费用。请求依法判令王升杰赔偿因排放含酸废水而造成的环境损失109 000元,承担原告因本案诉讼而发生的合理费用3500元。
 连云港市人民检察院支持起诉认为:被告王升杰因私自设置管道渗坑排放含酸废水,导致河流污染。根据《中华人民共和国环境保护法》第四十一条规定,造成环境污染危害的,有责任排除危害,并对直接受到损害的单位或者个人赔偿损失。《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第十五条规定,机关、社会团体、企事业单位对损害国家、集体或者个人民事权益的行为,可以支持受损害的单位或者个人向人民法院起诉。现依法支持连云港市赣榆区环境保护协会提起环境公益诉讼,及时追回相关赔偿费用,治理受污染的河流。
 被告王升杰辩称:关于环境污染一事属实,我愿意对环境损害的损失进行赔偿,积极配合法院在自己能力范围内给受害方赔偿。如果钱实在赔不够,我愿意做一些公益事业来弥补我所造成的损害。我对自己造成的环境损害深感后悔,以后一定多做一些对环境有益的事情。
 原告赣榆环保协会为支持自己的主张,向江苏省连云港市中级人民法院提交了以下证据:
 第一组证据:原告赣榆环保协会的社会团体登记证书,证明原告系从事环境公益事业的社会团体,具备提起公益诉讼的主体资格。
 第二组证据:
 证据1,原赣榆县公安局对被告王升杰的讯问笔录6份;
 证据2,原赣榆县环境监测站的监测报告6份,证明被告王升杰排水出口及龙北干渠等处的污水及受污染的河水中PH值和氟化物严重超标,其中PH值最高超标4.38倍,氟化物最高超标45.8倍。
 证据3,江苏省环境保护厅公函一份,证明原赣榆县环境监测站的监测数据得到省厅认可,符合证据要求。
 证据4,原赣榆县公安局刑警大队现场勘验检查工作记录一份,证实被告王升杰排污及污染河道的现场情况。
 第三组证据:
 证据1,连云港市环境保护科学研究所评估报告一份,证明被告王升杰污染河道的污染修复费用为109000元。
 证据2,代理费发票一份,证明原告赣榆环保协会为提起公益诉讼支出律师费用3500元。
 经庭审质证,被告王升杰对原告赣榆环保协会所举证据的真实性、合法性及与本案的关联性均无异议。
 被告王升杰未向江苏省连云港市中级人民法院提交证据。
 在本案审理过程中,江苏省连云港市中级人民法院依法调查了赣榆区石桥镇石拱齐村村支部书记尹相仁。尹相仁证明,被告王升杰的石英石加工厂已停产,没有继续生产经营。王升杰家庭条件较差,尚欠有许多债务。
 经庭审质证,原告赣榆环保协会、被告王升杰对江苏省连云港市中级人民法院调取的证据真实性、合法性均无异议。
 ......

Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥500.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese