>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
The No. 2 Branch of the People's Procuratorate of Beijing Municipality v. Li Jiating (Case on Acceptance of Bribes)
北京市人民检察院第二分院诉李嘉廷受贿案
【法宝引证码】
  • Type of Dispute: Criminal-->Graft & Bribery
  • Legal document: Ruling
  • Judgment date: 06-20-2003
  • Procedural status: Trial at Second Instance

The No. 2 Branch of the People’s Procuratorate of Beijing Municipality v. Li Jiating (Case on Acceptance of Bribes)
(Case on Acceptance of Bribes)
北京市人民检察院第二分院诉李嘉廷受贿案
The No. 2 Branch of the People's Procuratorate of Beijing Municipality v. Li Jiating
(Case on Acceptance of Bribes)@#
BASIC FACTS@#
Prosecuting Organ: No. 2 Branch of the People's Procuratorate of Beijing Municipality.@#
Defendant: Li Jiating, male, 59, former deputy secretary of Yunnan Provincial Committee of CPC, governor of Yunnan Provincial People's Government, dwelling at Xichang Road, Kunming City, Yunnan Province. He was arrested on October 10, 2001.@#
With regard to the case on Li Jiating's acceptance of bribes, the No. 2 Branch of the People's Procuratorate of Beijing Municipality lodged a prosecution to the No.2 Intermediate People's Court of Beijing Municipality (hereinafter referred to as Beijing No. 2 Intermediate Court) on March 6, 2003.@#
The bill of indictment describes: From the first half of 1994 to July 2000, Li Jiating took advantage of his position to secure benefits for a number of persons, accepted bribes alone or in collusion with Li Bo, his son, totaling CNY 10,380,000, HKD 6,490,000, USD 91,000, and JPY 200,000, an equivalent of CNY 18,105,323.75. The Prosecuting Organ held that, Li Jiating was a state functionary, took advantage of his position to secure benefits for others and accepted properties from others, and his acts constituted the crime of accepting bribes, with the amount being huge and the circumstances being particularly serious.@#
Li Jiating had no objection to the basic criminal facts described by the Prosecuting Organ, but alleged: I am not clear about the specific amount of the money accepted by Li Bo; I never asked for any money or property from any other person on my initiative; I did not directly take advantage of my power when handling most of the affairs for others; I did not cause any direct economic loss to the state when securing benefits for others.@#
Li Jiating's defender held that: Li Jiating's subjective recognition of whether Li Bo did business with other people through partnership need to be further verified; Li Jiating was not clear about the specific amount of the money accepted by Li Bo; the benefits secured by Li Jiating for some requestors were not obvious; some people had no specific request when they offered money to Li Jiating; Li Jiating had no act of asking for properties, and basically did not secure illegitimate benefits; Li Jiating showed an good attitude to confessing his crime, and performed major meritorious services. The defender also held that Li Jiating should be given mitigated punishments.@#
It was verified by Beijing No. 2 Intermediate Court after trial that:@#
Since November 1992, Li Jiating successively served as a member of Yunnan Provincial Standing Committee of CPC, vice governor of Yunnan Provincial People's Government, deputy secretary of Yunnan Provincial Committee of CPC, and governor of Yunnan Provincial People's Government. From 1994 to July 2000, Li Jiating took advantage of his position to secure benefits for other people, accepted money from 10 persons successively for 30 times either alone or in collusion with Li Bo, his son (punished in another case). The specific facts were as follows:@#
I. In September 1994, before Li Jiating visited USA, he accepted USD 1,000 from Yang Rong, board chairman of Hong Kong Huande Limited Company. In early 1995, Li Jiating was requested by Yang Rong to call He Zhaoshou, director general of Yunnan Provincial Tobacco Monopoly Administration, to favor Yang Rong's export of cigarettes, and thus Yang Rong made a huge amount of profits. During that period, Yang Rong proposed to Li Jiating to apply for a pass to Hong Kong and Macao for Li Bo, Li Jiating's son. In May 1995, Yang Rong spent CNY 500,000 in obtaining a pass to Hong Kong and Macao for Li Bo in a fictitious and homonymous name “Li Bo”, and told Li Jiating of the fact. After Li Jiating asked Yang Rong to favor Li Bo in respect of his living and funds in Hong Kong, Yang Rong separately deposited HKD 300,000 and HKD 500,000 in the Bank of China, Hong Kong Branch and Hong Kong Chartered Bank in the fictitious and homonymous name “Li Bo”, and then handed over the deposit certificates to Li Bo. In 1996, Li Jiating was requested by Yang Rong to urge the Planning Department of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration to fulfill the target for Yang Rong to export cigarettes, and called He Zhaoshou to favor Yang Rong in this regard. During that period, Li Jiating again asked Yang Rong to favor Li Bo. In September, when Li Jiating arrived in Hong Kong after his visit abroad, Yang Rong offered Li Jiating HKD 30,000. In January 1997, Yang Rong offered Li Bo HKD 5 million in Hong Kong. In early 1997, Li Jiating introduced Yang Rong to Zhang Xiuliang, general manager of Yunnan Petroleum Company, and urged them to establish Yunnan Huafeng Petroleum and Chemicals Limited Company (hereinafter referred to as Huafeng Company) in the form of joint venture. Yang Rong served as the board chairman. After the company made profits, Yang Rong deposited HKD 300,000 by twice into Li Bo's account in HSBC separately in 1999 and 2000. After Li Jiating learned of the fact, he told Li Bo for many times that the money was the co-owned property of the whole family and should not be splurged. In order to restrict Li Bo from using the accepted money, Li Jiating had Wang Xiao (his wife) and Li Bo open a joint account in HSBC in 1998.@#
......
 北京市人民检察院第二分院诉李嘉廷受贿案@#
@#
公诉机关:北京市人民检察院第二分院。@#
被告人:李嘉廷,男,59岁,原系中共云南省委副书记、云南省人民政府省长,住云南省昆明市西昌路。2001年 10月10日被逮捕。@#
被告人李嘉廷受贿案由北京市人民检察院第二分院于2003年3月6日向北京市第二中级人民法院提起公诉。@#
起诉书指控:1994年上半年至2000年7月,被告人李嘉廷利用职务上的便利,为多人谋取利益,同儿子李勃或单独收受贿赂共计人民币1038万元、港币649万元、美元9.1万元、日元20万元,折合人民币共计18105323.75元。公诉机关认为,李嘉廷身为国家工作人员,利用职务上的便利,为他人谋取利益,收受他人财物,构成受贿罪,数额巨大,情节特别严重。@#
被告人李嘉廷对公诉机关指控的基本犯罪事实无异议,但辩称:不清楚李勃收钱的具体数额;从未主动索要他人钱财;为他人办事绝大多数不属于直接利用职权;为他人谋利没有给国家造成直接经济损失。@#
被告人李嘉廷的辩护人认为:李嘉廷在主观上对李勃与他人是否合伙做生意的认知程度需进一步查实;李嘉廷不清楚李勃收钱的具体数额;李嘉廷为一些请托人谋利不明显;一些人向李嘉廷送钱时没有具体的请托事项;李嘉廷无索取财物行为,基本上没有谋取不正当利益;李嘉廷认罪态度积极,有重大立功表现。并认为对李嘉廷应减轻处罚。@#
北京市第二中级人民法院经审理查明:@#
被告人李嘉廷于1992年11月起先后任中共云南省委常委、云南省人民政府副省长、中共云南省委副书记、云南省人民政府省长。1994年至2000年7月,李嘉延利用职务上的便利,为他人谋取利益,单独或伙同儿子李勃(另案处理)先后30次收受10人的钱款,具体事实如下:@#
一、1994年9月,李嘉廷出访美国前,收受香港焕德有限公司董事长杨荣1000美元。1995年初,李嘉廷应杨荣的请托,打电话让云南省烟草专卖局局长何兆寿对杨荣出口香烟予以照顾,使杨荣获得巨额利润。在此期间,杨荣向李嘉廷提出,要为李嘉廷之子李勃办理前往港澳通行证。同年5月,杨荣出资人民币50万元,以“李博”的假名为李勃办理了前往港澳通行证,并告诉了李嘉廷。李嘉廷让杨荣对李勃在香港的生活和资金方面给予照顾后,杨荣在中国银行香港分行和香港渣打银行分别以“李博”的名字为李勃存入港币30万元和50万元,并将存折交给李勃。1996年,李嘉廷应杨荣请托,向国家烟草专卖局计划司催办落实杨荣出口香烟指标一事,还打电话让何兆寿予以照顾。其间,李嘉廷再次要杨荣对李勃予以关照。同年9月,李嘉廷出访返经香港时,杨荣送李嘉廷港币3万元。1997年1月,杨荣在香港给李勃港币500万元。1997年初,李嘉廷将杨荣介绍给云南省石油总公司总经理张修亮,促成其合资成立了云南华丰石化有限公司(以下简称华丰公司),杨荣任董事长。公司获利后,杨荣分别于1999年和2000年,在香港汇丰银行李勃的帐户两次各存入港币30万元。李嘉廷知道后多次叮嘱李勃:钱是全家的共同财产,不要乱花。为限制李勃动用收受的钱款李嘉廷还于1998年让其妻王骁和李勃在香港汇丰银行开设了联名帐户。@#
证明以上事实的主要证据有:@#
1.证人李勃的证言。主要内容是:杨荣在云南做生意时,李嘉廷帮了很多忙,为表示感谢,1995年5月,杨荣花50万元在广东用“李博”的名字为他办理了赴港澳的单程通行证。同年9月,杨荣在香港渣打银行和中国银行用“李博”的名字开户,分别为他存入30万元港币和50万元港币。1997年初,杨荣给他一张500万元港币支票,1999年下半年和2000年1月,杨荣分两次给他60万元港币支票。这些情况他都告诉了李嘉廷。为此,李嘉廷多次叮嘱:这钱是全家的钱,不许乱动。1998年,李嘉廷为控制他用钱,让他和母亲王骁一起到香港汇丰银行开立了联名帐户,把杨荣等人给的钱全部存入该帐户。@#
2.证人杨荣的证言。主要内容是:1994年,他听说李嘉廷要出国考察,送给李嘉廷1000美元。1995年初,李勃即将大学毕业时,他向李嘉廷提出为李勃办赴香港定居的单程通行证。同年5月,他花了50万元用“李博”的名字办理了通行证。李嘉廷知道后,让他在香港的生活、资金方面照顾李勃。同年8月,他为李勃在中国银行香港分行和渣打银行开户,分别存入港币30万元和50万元。1995年,他为出口香烟两次找李嘉廷帮忙,李嘉廷都要求有关部门给予照顾。1996年9月,李嘉廷途经香港时,他送给李嘉廷3万元港币。1997年1月,他在香港给了李勃500万港币。1997年初,他准备在云南投资石油制品,李嘉廷将他介绍给云南省石油总公司总经理张修亮。经商谈合资成立了华丰公司,他获利100多万元人民币。1999年下半年和2000年1月,他分两次给李勃各30万元港币。@#
3.证人何兆寿的证言。主要内容是:1995年初和1996年上半年,李嘉廷两次给他打电话,要求对杨荣出口香烟的品种搭配上给予照顾。@#
4.证人杨有珠的证言。主要内容是:他任云南省烟草专卖局副局长时,按照何兆寿的指示,通过中国烟草云南进出口有限公司为杨荣办理了香烟出口。@#
5.证人张修亮的证言。主要内容是:1997年4月,经李嘉廷介绍,云南省石油总公司与杨荣合资成立了华丰公司,杨荣任董事长、法定代表人。该公司经营一年半后停业,杨荣分得100多万元利润。@#
6.广东省茂名市公安局证明材料、“李博”的《前往港澳通行证(单程)》。证明杨荣1995年5月在茂明市公安局以“李博”的名字为李勃办理了前往港澳通行证(单程)。@#
7.李嘉廷的供述。主要内容是:李勃收到杨荣钱后,他多次告诉李勃,这钱是全家的钱,要在香港放好,不许乱动。他还让李勃、王骁去香港银行开了一个联名帐户,把家里的钱和杨荣给李勃的钱都存在联名帐户里。@#
二、1996年,李勃想利用李嘉廷的权力和影响赚钱,李嘉廷表示同意并嘱咐李勃找人合作,有事由他向有关部门打招呼。1997年4、5月,李嘉廷经李勃介绍,接受云南俊发房地产股份有限公司(以下简称俊发公司)董事长李俊及其父昆明明兴屋业开发有限公司(以下简称明兴公司)董事长李黎明的请托,为使二人承揽到昆明市五华区螺狮湾市场改造工程,打电话让五华区区长廖晓珊帮助协调。后五华区政府未经招标,即与明兴公司签订了开发螺狮湾市场工程的协议,明兴公司从中获利人民币1500余万元,李俊承诺日后将分给李勃人民币500万元。1998年初,经李勃同意,其兄李群从李俊处提取人民币200万元。后李勃又向李俊索要300万元,并提出再借一笔钱用于炒股。同年5月,李俊以汇票方式向李勃提供人民币750万元,其中450万元为借款。1998年10月,李嘉廷通过李勃接受李俊的请托,为使俊发公司获得昆明市园林住宅小区的开发权,将昆明市官渡区政府有关请示批转云南省政府副省长邵填伟、副秘书长崔质涛,要求其抓紧协调。1998年底,官渡区政府与俊发公司签订了开发园林住宅小区的协议。为此,李俊免除了李勃450万元借款。1999年8月,俊发公司想压低园林住宅小区项目地价,李俊请李嘉廷帮助,李嘉廷又指示他人对此进行协调。李勃将收受李俊上述钱款的情况均告诉了李嘉廷,李嘉廷叮嘱李勃,把钱在香港存起来,这是家庭财产。@#
证明以上事实的主要证据有:@#
1.证人李勃的证言。主要内容是:1996年上半年,他想利用李嘉廷的权力和影响做生意赚钱,并让李俊寻找项目,进行合作。李嘉廷知道后表示:“你和李俊合伙挣钱可以,但不要抛头露面,有事让李俊直接到家找我,我可以给有关部门打招呼。”1997年初,李俊提出昆明五华区螺狮湾市场要改造,李嘉廷让李俊、李黎明到家中面谈,并帮李俊、李黎明承揽到螺蛳湾工程,李俊、李黎明因此赚了1500万元,答应要分他500万元。1998年初,经他同意,李群向李俊要了200万元。他向李俊要剩下的300万元时,提出因炒股还需向其借钱。李俊后来给了一张750万元的现金汇票,其中450万元为借款。1998年下半年,李俊看中官渡区一块地,让他找李嘉廷办批文,李嘉廷知道后将李俊叫到家中面谈,并帮李俊拿到了700亩的指标用地。李俊后来说,他借的450万元不用还了。@#
2.证人李俊的证言。主要内容是:1997年3、4月份,李勃对他说,想通过他做生意赚钱。他发现螺蛳湾老市场要改造,就让李勃找李嘉廷帮忙。明兴公司拿到开发权后,盈利1500多万元。1998年春节,李群经李勃同意向他要了200万元;同年5月中旬,他又交给李勃一张750万元的汇票,其中300万元算螺蛳湾项目的钱,剩下的450万元为借款。1998年10月,他听说昆明市官渡区申请世博会用地指标,向市里写了报告。为了帮助跑下指标,取得优先开发权,他让李勃请李嘉廷帮忙。报告批下来了后,李勃对他说,这事是李嘉廷冒风险办的,还说炒股亏了,无法还借款。螺狮湾工程和园林小区指标用地,如果李嘉廷不出面很难拿到.他给李勃这么多钱,实际上是为了感谢李嘉廷。@#
3.证人李黎明的证言。主要内容是:他为承建螺狮湾市场改造工程及获得园林住宅小区开发权,通过李勃找李嘉廷帮忙。1998年初,他从别人处借了200万元现金给李俊,作为因螺狮湾工程给李勃的钱。@#
4.证人廖晓珊的证言。主要内容是:1997年区政府计划对螺狮湾市场进行改造,想参加建设的几家单位竞争激烈。一天晚上,李嘉廷给他打电话,介绍了李黎明父子。他又将其介绍给副区长高劲松等人。后来,螺蛳湾市场改造工程未招标,直接交给了李黎明承建。@#
5.证人高劲松的证言。主要内容是:按照廖晓珊的意图,将螺蛳湾市场改造项目交给了明兴公司承建。@#
6.证人崔质涛的证言。主要内容是:他按照李嘉廷的批示,就园林住宅小区项目列入世博会重点配套工程及压低该项目地价问题召开过两次协调会。@#
7.证人张忠的证言。主要内容是:1998年6月他任官渡区区长时,向上报送了《关于开发建设99世博会配套工程园林住宅小区的请示》。李黎明找李嘉廷帮忙后,省政府批准了报告,官渡区政府优先给了李黎明父子700亩指标用地。@#
8.昆明市人民政府《关于开发建设99世博会配套工程园林住宅小区的请示》批示件。李嘉廷的批示为:“琪伟、质涛同志,这是国际惯例(奥运会、博览会均如此),我省如何处理?望抓紧协调,提出意见,以免延误工期”。@#
9.李嘉廷的供述。主要内容是:1996年,李勃想做生意赚钱,他表示同意并嘱咐李勃不要出头露面,可以找人合作,由他向有关部门打招呼。李勃在螺蛳湾市场和园林住宅小区项目中只起与李黎明、李俊父子联络的作用。李俊送钱给李勃,主要是他出面帮了忙。李勃每次收钱后,都对他讲了。他对李勃说,这些钱来的不容易,是全家的,让李勃把钱在香港存好。@#
三、1994年9月,李嘉廷出访美国期间,云南省驻京办副主任葛建辉为使个人发展能得到李嘉廷的帮助,让在美国定居的弟弟葛景辉送给李嘉廷2000美元。此后,葛建辉陪同李嘉廷在北京看望回国的葛景辉时,葛景辉又送给李嘉廷1万美元,并请李嘉廷对葛建辉的工作给予支持、帮助。1998年2月,经李嘉廷提议,葛建辉调任云南省人民政府驻深圳办事处主任。@#
证明以上事实的主要证据有:@#
1.证人葛建辉的证言。主要内容是:1994年9月,李嘉廷去美国时,他打电话让在美国的弟弟葛景辉好好接待李嘉廷,为自己的发展做些铺垫。事后葛景辉说送给李嘉廷2000美元。后葛景辉回国,又送给李嘉廷1万美元。@#
2.证人葛景辉的证言。主要内容是:他按葛建辉的安排,两次送给李嘉廷1.2万美元,请其对葛建辉的工作给予照顾。@#
......

Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥1400.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese