Wang Chunlin v. Yinchuan Aluminum Extrusion Factory
(Case on Post-final Retrial of the Dispute over Premium Savings Deposit Certificate)@#
BASIC FACTS@#
Petitioner for Post-final Retrial (defendant in the first instance and appellant in the second instance): Wang Chunlin, female, 38, statistician of Yinchuan Aluminum Extrusion Factory in Yinchuan, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, dwelling in Yinchuan.@#
Respondent (plaintiff in the first instance and appellee in the second instance): Yinchuan Aluminum Extrusion Factory in Yinchuan, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.@#
Legal Representative: Zhang Ningtao, the factory director.@#
Authorized Agent: He Jianguo, cadre of Yinchuan Aluminum Extrusion Factory.@#
PROCEDURAL POSTURE@#
Wang Chunlin, the petitioner for post-final retrial, was dissatisfied with No. 200 (1994) final civil judgment of the Intermediate People's Court of Yinchuan Municipality (hereinafter referred to as Yinchuan Intermediate Court) due to a dispute with Yinchuan Aluminum Extrusion Factory in Yinchuan, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region over a premium savings deposit certificate, and petitioned to the Higher People's Court of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (hereinafter referred to as Ningxia Higher Court) for post-final retrial on the ground that the premium she got was lawful proceeds instead of unjust enrichment. Ningxia Higher Court thought the original final judgment was indeed wrong, and ruled in accordance with Article 179 (1) (iii) and Article 183 of the “Civil Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China” to brought the case up for trial. It was found out after the trial:@#
．．．．．．

王春林与银川铝型材厂有奖储蓄存单纠纷再审案@#
@#
申请再审人（一审被告、二审上诉人）：王春林，女，３８岁，宁夏回族自治区银川市银川铝型材厂统计员，住银川市。@#
被申请再审人（一审原告、二审被上诉人）：宁夏回族自治区银川市银川铝型材厂。@#
法定代表人：张宁涛，厂长。@#
委托代理人：何建国，银川铝型材厂干部。@#
@#
申请再审人王春林因与宁夏回族自治区银川市银川铝型材厂发生有奖储蓄存单纠纷，不服银川市中级人民法院（１９９４）银民终字第２００号终审民事判决，以其取得奖金是合法收益、不属不当得利为由，向宁夏回族自治区高级人民法院申请再审。宁夏回族自治区高级人民法院认为原终审判决确有错误，依照《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第一百七十九条第一款第（三）项、第一百八十三条的规定，裁定予以提审。经审理查明：@#
１９９３年６月２６日，银川铝型材厂从中国银行银川市支行中湖储蓄所购买了１００张面额１００元的定期定额有奖储蓄存单，存单背面标明中奖率为１００％。１９９３年７月１０日，中国银行银川市支行公开摇奖，在宁夏日报第四版上公布了中奖号码，同时规定从１９９３年７月１５日至１０月１５日为兑奖期限，逾期不兑视为弃奖。在此期间，银川铝型材厂始终未去兑奖。１９９３年１０月１５日，在兑奖的最后一日，银川铝型材厂将有奖储蓄存单发给本厂职工，代替欠发工人的工资。该厂职工王春林领到奖券后，经核对，该奖券的号码００３１７２号中了一等奖，奖金１万元。王春林即持该奖券到银行领取了奖金。银川铝型材厂得知王春林中奖情况后，认为此奖金应归厂方所有，没有及时兑奖，是因厂方主管人员的疏忽大意，未了解中奖情况所致，王春林应将１万元奖金交回厂里，由厂里按幸运奖赠与王春林１８８８元。厂方意见被王春林拒绝，因而发生纠纷。银川铝型材厂遂向银川市城区人民法院提起诉讼，请求判令王春林返还奖金１万元。@#
银川市城区人民法院认为，银行发放的００３１９２号有奖储蓄存单，在１９９３年７月１０日公开摇奖时中奖，使该存单从票面值１００元升值为１０１００元。此时，银川铝型材厂是已升值存单的合法持有人，奖金１万元是持有人的合法收益。由于银川铝型材厂主管人员的疏忽大意，未了解存单中奖情况，而将已升值为１０１００元的存单仍以票面值１００元发放给王春林。依照《中华人民共和国民法通则》第五十九条第一款第（一）项的规定，银川铝型材厂的行为属重大误解，是可撤销的民事行为。依照民法通则第九十二条的规定，王春林在对方对自己的行为有重大误解的情况下领到存单，进而取得１万元奖金，是没有合法根据的不当得利，应当返还。银川铝型材厂虽然表示在王春林返还１万元奖金后，从中拿出１８８８元作为幸运奖赠与王春林，但因王春林拒绝受赠，依照最高人民法院《关于贯彻执行＜中华人民共和国民法通则＞若干问题的意见（试行）》第１２８条的规定，赠与关系不能成立。据此，银川市城区人民法院于１９９４年５月２０日判决：王春林于判决生效后１５日内返还银川铝型材厂不当得利１万元，逾期承担法律责任。@#
．．．．．．