|
|
|
No. 9 of Nine Model Trial Cases Involving Environmental Resources Published by the Supreme People's Court: Wang Shilong v. Liu Junbo for Dispute over a Contract on Transfer of Mining Rights
|
|
最高人民法院公布的九起环境资源审判典型案例之九：王仕龙与刘俊波采矿权转让合同纠纷案
|
|
|
|
No. 9 of Nine Model Trial Cases Involving Environmental Resources Published by the Supreme People's Court: Wang Shilong v. Liu Junbo for Dispute over a Contract on Transfer of Mining Rights
最高人民法院公布的九起环境资源审判典型案例之九：王仕龙与刘俊波采矿权转让合同纠纷案
|
|
[核心术语]
采矿权转让;报批手续;解除合同
|
|
[争议焦点]
1.当事人签订采矿权转让合同后，未依法履行报批手续的，一方提起诉讼要求解除合同时，法院能否判令双方按照各自义务办理相应报批手续？
|
|
[案例要旨]
根据《合同法》的规定一般的合同自合同成立时生效。法律和行政法规规定需要经批准或者登记才能生效的合同当事人应当办理相应的报批手续。当事人签订采矿权转让合同后未依法履行报批手续的此时合同尚未生效。但按照法律规定合法成立的合同仍然对双方当事人具有法律拘束力...
|
| No. 9 of Nine Model Trial Cases Involving Environmental Resources Published by the Supreme People's Court: Wang Shilong v. Liu Junbo for Dispute over a Contract on Transfer of Mining Rights | | 最高人民法院公布的九起环境资源审判典型案例之九：王仕龙与刘俊波采矿权转让合同纠纷案 |
| 1. Basic Facts | | （一）基本案情 |
| On August 27, 2007, Wang Shilong, in the name of Xinglong County Simin Marble Quarry, entered into a contract on mine transfer with Liu Junbo which stipulated that Wang Shilong transferred Xinglong County Simin Marble Quarry to Liu Junbo at the price of 3.05 million yuan. Such contents as payment terms and liabilities for breach of contract were also stipulated in the contract. After conclusion of the contract, Liu Junbo made a payment of transfer of 1.335 million yuan in total. Liu Junbo built mine roads and some workshops, but he did not exploit the marble mine. Afterwards, Wang Shilong instituted a lawsuit on the ground that Liu Junbo failed to make a payment in full amount, and requested the court to order that the contract on mine transfer should be terminated and Liu Junbo should return the mine and pay liquidated damages of 760,000 yuan. Liu Junbo raised a counterclaim and requested the court to order that Wang Shilong should continue to perform the contract and compensate for the losses of 1,088,000 yuan. | | 2007年8月27日，王仕龙以兴隆县龙思敏大理石厂的名义与刘俊波订立了矿山转让合同书，该合同约定王仕龙将兴隆县龙思敏大理石厂作价305万元转让给刘俊波。合同还对付款期限，违约责任等内容进行了约定。合同签订后，刘俊波共支付转让款等款项共计133.5万元。刘俊波修建了矿路及部分厂房，但未对该大理石矿进行开采。后王仕龙以刘俊波未足额付款为由提起诉讼请求判令解除矿山转让合同，刘俊波返还矿山并给付违约金76万元。刘俊波提起反诉请求判令王仕龙继续履行合同并赔偿损失108.8万元。 |
| ．．．．．． | | （二）裁判结果 |
| | ．．．．．． |
|
Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.
1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.
2. Binding to the account with access to this database.
3. Apply for a trial account.
4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【￥200.00】 for your single purchase. | |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户；您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买，支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
|
|
|
|
|
|