>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Huang Jingjia v. People's Procuratorate of Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province (Case of the State Criminal Compensation)
黄景嘉国家刑事赔偿案
【法宝引证码】

Huang Jingjia v. People’s Procuratorate of Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province (Case of the State Criminal Compensation)
(Case of the State Criminal Compensation)
黄景嘉国家刑事赔偿案

Huang Jingjia v. People's Procuratorate of Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province

 

黄景嘉国家刑事赔偿案@#

(Case of the State Criminal Compensation)@# @#
BASIC FACTS@# 赔偿请求人:黄景嘉,男,47岁,浙江省平湖市人,浙江省平湖市教委干部。@#
Compensation Claimant: Huang Jingjia, male, 47 years old, Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province, Cadre of the Educational Commission of Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province@# 委托代理人:夏建军,浙江君胜律师事务所律师。@#
Authorized Agent: Xia Jianjun, lawyer of Junsheng Law Firm, Zhejiang Province@# 委托代理人:夏吉先,华东政法学院教授。@#
Authorized Agent: Xia Jixian, professor of the East China University of Politics and Law@# 赔偿义务机关:浙江省平湖市人民检察院。@#
Organ Liable for Compensation: the People's Procuratorate of Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province@# 法定代表人:赵陆鸣,检察长。@#
Legal Representative: Zhao Luming, chief prosecutor@# 复议机关:浙江省嘉兴市人民检察院。@#
Review Organ: the People's Procuratorate of Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province@# 法定代表人:朱立乔,检察长。@#
Legal Representative: Zhu Liqiao, chief prosecutor@# 黄景嘉以曾被浙江省平湖市人民检察院错误逮捕、羁押共204天为由,向浙江省嘉兴市中级人民法院赔偿委员会提出刑事赔偿申请,要求平湖市人民检察院赔偿侵犯其人身自由的赔偿金,并支付精神损失费5万元;公开为其消除影响、恢复名誉、赔礼道歉。@#
Huang filed an application for criminal compensation with the Compensation Committee of the Intermediate People's Court of Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province for the 204-day wrongful arrest and detainment conducted by the people's Procuratorate of Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province, requesting the People's Procuratorate of Pinghu City to compensate for the infringement upon his personal freedom and pay 50, 000 yuan of the relevant losses due to emotional disturbance; and publicly eradicate the negative effect, recover his reputation and make an apology.@# 嘉兴市中级人民法院赔偿委员会经审理查明:@#
...... 1998年10月7日,平湖市人民检察院根据举报,派人将赔偿请求人黄景嘉带到该院反贪局进行调查。10月9日,以黄景嘉在担任平湖中学办公室主任、校办企业负责人期间涉嫌贪污为由,将黄景嘉拘留。10月23日,以涉嫌贪污为由将黄景嘉逮捕。1999年4月29日,平湖市人民检察院决定,对黄景嘉取保候审,解除羁押。同年9月29日,平湖市人民检察院以主要证人去向不明、使案件难以审结为由,作出了撤销黄景嘉涉嫌贪污案的决定。自1998年10月7日至1999年4月29日,黄景嘉共被剥夺人身自由204天。@#
 2000年5月22日,赔偿请求人黄景嘉以平湖市人民检察院错误逮捕为由,向该院提出赔偿申请。同年6月22日,平湖市人民检察院作出刑事确认书,对赔偿请求不予确认。同年6月26日,赔偿请求人黄景嘉向复议机关嘉兴市人民检察院提出申诉。同年8月25日,嘉兴市人民检察院作出刑事确认申诉复查决定书,维持了平湖市人民检察院的不予确认决定。@#
 认定上述事实的依据有:1998年10月7日和10月8日浙江省平湖市人民检察院对黄景嘉调查笔录;浙江省平湖市人民检察院平检反贪拘通(98)9号拘留通知书、平检反贪逮通(1998)9号逮捕通知书、平检保书(1999)12号保证书、平检撤案(1999)第1号撤销案件决定书、平检确字(2000)第1号刑事确认书;浙江省嘉兴市人民检察院浙嘉检确复决字(2000)第1号刑事确认申诉复查决定书。@#
 赔偿义务机关抗辩认为:本案未经确认,不能进入赔偿程序,赔偿委员会应不予受理;赔偿请求人黄景嘉有贪污犯罪事实,只是因为主要证人案发时出走,至今去向不明,致使证据达不到确实、充分的起诉条件而撤销案件,不属于错误拘留,不应当赔偿。@#
 ......

Dear visitor, you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases. If you are not a subscriber, you can pay for a document through Online Pay and read it immediately after payment.
An entity user can apply for a trial account or contact us for your purchase.
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com

 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容;
单位用户可申请试用或者来电咨询购买。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:database@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese