>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
People v. Yan Yan (case of fraud)
山东德州中院判决闫嫣诈骗案
【法宝引证码】
*尊敬的用户,您好!本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务,如需整篇翻译,请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com,或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com

People v. Yan Yan (case of fraud)
(case of fraud)
山东德州中院判决闫嫣诈骗案
[Key Terms]
illegal possession ; crime of fraud ; private lending
[核心术语]
非法占有;诈骗罪;民间借贷
[Disputed Issues]
If an actor, for the purpose of illegal possession, cheats others of a rather large amount of money in the form of high-interest money loan, does the act constitute private lending or fraud?
[争议焦点]
行为人以非法占有为目的,通过高息借贷的方式,骗取他人财物,数额较大的,属于民事借贷还是构成诈骗罪?
[Case Summary]
Under the provisions of Article 266 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China fraud means an act of swindling a rather large amount of private and public money by making up or concealing facts for the purpose of illegal possession. An actor always covers the nature of fraud in a way such as lending money providing high interest making an IOU note and other ways and the key to distinguishing fraud from the private lending is whether the actor subjectively pursues the purpose of illegal possession. If subjectively...
[案例要旨]
依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百六十六条的规定诈骗是以非法占有为目的用虚构事实或者隐瞒真相的方法骗取数额较大的公私财物的行为。行为人往往采用借款、高息、打借条等方式掩护诈骗本质区分诈骗和民间借贷的关键在于行为人在主观上是否具有非法占有的目的。如果主观上没有非法占有的目的...

Full-texted omitted.

 

山东德州中院判决闫嫣诈骗案

 ——以占有为目的以借条作掩护借款能否构成诈骗

 裁判要旨
 行为人具有非法占有他人财物的目的,即使以借条等形式作掩护,也是以借款为名行诈骗之实,应以诈骗罪定罪量刑;如果主观上并无非法占有的目的,即使客观上使用了欺骗方法,由于其意志以外的客观原因,致使所借款物一时无力偿还,应属于民事借贷纠纷。
 案情
 被告人闫嫣系夏津县电业局某供电所正式职工。2009年3月至2011年8月,闫嫣以其姐姐用钱、其公公孙某的纱厂用钱为由,以月息八厘至一分五的利息向其7名亲戚借款98万元、向15名同事借款119万元,所借款项除借给其姐姐外,陆续用于其个人做生意及做期货,并按约定支付利息104340元。闫嫣自2011年4月份开始做期货,2011年9月下旬因做配资期货出现巨额亏损。自2011年9月24日至2011年11月22日,被告人闫嫣在明知做期货巨额亏损无力偿还借款人的情况下,仍以其公公孙某的纱厂用钱为名,以给付月息一分五至二分不等高息为诱饵,骗取被害人杜某、赵某等26人共计234万元,除1.9万元用于支付利息,另外232.1万元用于其个人炒期货赔光。
 裁判
 山东省德州市中级人民法院经审理认为,被告人闫嫣以非法占有为目的,多次虚构事实、隐瞒真相,骗取他人钱财,其行为构成诈骗罪,且数额特别巨大。公诉机关指控的罪名及部分犯罪事实成立,本院予以确认。对于被告人闫嫣用诈骗的钱款支付给被害人的本金、利息,因未实际占有,应从其诈骗总额中扣除。依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百六十六条、第五十二条、第五十三条、第六十四条之规定,判决:被告人闫嫣犯诈骗罪,判处有期徒刑十三年,并处罚金人民币五十万元。
 ......

Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥300.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese