>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
No. 8 of Ten Model Cases Involving the Protection of Consumer Rights Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Sun Baojing v. Shanghai Yidingdei Beauty Co., Ltd. (Health care service contract dispute)
最高人民法院公布10起维护消费者权益典型案例之八:孙宝静诉上海一定得美容有限公司保健服务合同纠纷案
【法宝引证码】
*尊敬的用户,您好!本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务,如需整篇翻译,请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com,或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com

No. 8 of Ten Model Cases Involving the Protection of Consumer Rights Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Sun Baojing v. Shanghai Yidingdei Beauty Co., Ltd. (Health care service contract dispute)
(Health care service contract dispute)
最高人民法院公布10起维护消费者权益典型案例之八:孙宝静诉上海一定得美容有限公司保健服务合同纠纷案
[Key Terms]
service contract ; a standard clause ; prepaying the service charges
[核心术语]
服务合同;格式条款;预付服务费
[Disputed Issues]

If the service provider stipulates in the standard clause that if the consumer waivers accepting services, the unconsumed prepaid service charges will not be returned, is the stipulation valid?
[争议焦点]
1.服务提供者在合同格式条款中约定如消费者放弃接受服务,未消费的预付服务费不予退还,是否有效?
[Case Summary]

During the service contract fulfillment period a consumer has the right to waiver accepting services and if the service provider suffers losses it may request the consumer to assume certain liability but the prepaid service charges that haven't been consumed by the consumer shall be refunded. In the standard clause the service provider stipulates that...
[案例要旨]
消费者在服务合同履行期间有放弃继续接受服务的权力服务提供者因此受到损失可以要求消费者承担一定的责任但对于消费者未消费的预付服务费...
No. 8 of Ten Model Cases Involving the Protection of Consumer Rights Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Sun Baojing v. Shanghai Yidingdei Beauty Co., Ltd. (Health care service contract dispute)@# 最高人民法院公布10起维护消费者权益典型案例之八:孙宝静诉上海一定得美容有限公司保健服务合同纠纷案@#
—The “unilaterally imposed clauses” of a health care service contract are invalid, and the prepaid service charges for unconsumed services should be refunded.@# ——保健服务合同中的“霸王条款”无效,未消费的预付服务费应予退还@#
1. Basic Facts@# (一)基本案情@#
...... 2010年7月18日,孙宝静与上海一定得美容有限公司(以下简称一定得公司)签订服务协议,约定:服务期限6个月,选择价值10万元的尊贵疗程,所有项目疗程单价85折从卡内扣。孙宝静如未按计划及进程表接受服务,经善意提醒仍未改善且超过服务期限的,视为放弃服务;如因自身原因不能按制定的方案履行,则不能要求退还任何已支付的费用;如因自身原因连续三个月不能参加相关项目,则一定得公司有权终止服务,孙宝静不得要求退赔任何费用。一定得公司向孙宝静发布声明书,声明孙宝静必须遵从顾问指示和安排,如因个人原因不能配合致疗程失败或进度缓慢,一定得公司不负任何责任,也不退还余款并保留追究违约责任的权利。孙宝静在声明书上签字确认。之后孙宝静分两次向一定得公司支付了10万元的服务费,并多次接受相应的瘦身疗程服务,后孙宝静因体重未能减轻,停止接受瘦身疗程。孙宝静以对一定得公司的服务失去信心且服务期限业已过期,一定得公司收取服务费未提供有效服务为由,向法院提起诉讼,要求解除涉案服务协议,一定得公司返还孙宝静9万元。@#
 ......

Dear visitor, you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases. If you are not a subscriber, you can pay for a document through Online Pay and read it immediately after payment.
An entity user can apply for a trial account or contact us for your purchase.
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com

 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容;
单位用户可申请试用或者来电咨询购买。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:database@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese