>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Golden Human Computer Co., Ltd. v.HST Scientific and Technological Development Center (Dispute over Unfair Competition) (Dispute over Unfair Competition)
金洪恩电脑有限公司诉惠斯特科技开发中心不正当竞争纠纷案
【法宝引证码】
  • Type of Dispute: IPR-->Unfair Competition-->Counterfeiting
  • Legal document: Consent Judgment
  • Judgment date: 09-27-2000
  • Procedural status: Trial at Second Instance

Golden Human Computer Co., Ltd. v.HST Scientific and Technological Development Center (Dispute over Unfair Competition) (Dispute over Unfair Competition)
(Dispute over Unfair Competition)
金洪恩电脑有限公司诉惠斯特科技开发中心不正当竞争纠纷案

Golden Human Computer Co., Ltd. v.HST Scientific and Technological Development Center(Dispute over Unfair Competition)@#
BASIC FACTS@#
Plaintiff: Beijing Golden Human Computer Co., Ltd., domiciled at Pinggu Town, Pinggu County, Beijing Municipality.@#
Legal representative: Chi Yufeng, general manager of the company.@#
Authorized attorney: Qu Zhaoxu and Hao Jianping, lawyers from Beijing Lutong Law Firm.@#
Defendant: Beijing HST Scientific and Technological Development Center, domiciled at Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing City.@#
Legal representative: Yan Weidong, general manager of the company.@#
The plaintiff, Beijing Golden Human Computer Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Golden Human”) filed a claim at the People's Court of Haidian District, Beijing Municipality (hereinafter referred to as “Haidian Court”) against Beijing HST Scientific and Technological Development Center (hereinafter referred to as “HST”) concerning dispute over unfair competition.@#
Golden Human claimed: In November 1997, it independently developed and manufactured the “Gushen” software product for operation in the stock market, which had been published by the Publishing House of Tsinghua University. Since this software came into being, it has been in the front rank among the same type of products in respect of sales volume. It occupied a large market share, enjoyed high prestige, and became a kind of famous commodity. On 28th of April 1999, Golden Human obtained the No.1268788 trademark registration certificate, on the basis of which it could enjoy the right to exclusively use the “Gushen” trademark within the scope of the ninth category of commodities. Since 2000, HST had been marking the name of “Gushen2000” on the outer package of its software products but filling software with the name of “Classics on Stock Market”. Meanwhile, HST also used such words as “Gushen2000” and “ ‘Gushen2000' ceremoniously comes into the market”, etc. when publicizing through the homepage of its website the “Classics on Stock Market” which it had developed. The above said acts by HST had misled consumers to consider “Classics on Stock Market” as a new generation of upgraded product of “Gushen”, thus having infringed the legitimate rights and interests of Golden Human. Therefore, Golden Human requested Haidian Court to rule that HST: 1. immediately stop selling the product of infringement as well as the packages and decorations of the said product, and delete the false publicity from the homepage of its website; 2. make public apologies, eliminate the bad effects and publish an apology announcement in the homepage of its website, Computer and Computer Business Information; 3. compensate Golden Human for 200,000 Yuan of economic losses.@#
......

 

金洪恩电脑有限公司诉惠斯特科技开发中心不正当竞争纠纷案@#
@#
原告:北京金洪恩电脑有限公司。住所地:北京市平谷县平谷镇。@#
法定代表人:池宇峰,该公司总经理。@#
委托代理人:瞿朝旭、郝建平,北京市陆通律师事务所律师。@#
被告:北京惠斯特科技开发中心。住所地:北京市海淀区学院南路。@#
法定代表人:延伟东,该公司总经理。@#
原告北京金洪恩电脑有限公司(以下简称金洪恩公司)因与被告北京惠斯特科技开发中心(以下简称惠斯特中心)发生不正当竞争纠纷,向北京市海淀区人民法院提起诉讼。@#
原告金洪恩公司诉称:1997年11月,原告自主开发研制并由清华大学出版社出版了股市操作类软件产品“股神”。该软件自问世以来,一直位于同类产品销售量前列,占有相当的市场份额,且有较高的知名度,已成为知名商品。1999年4月28日,原告取得第1268788号商标注册证,在第九类商品范围内对“股神”商标享有专用权。自2000年开始,被告惠斯特中心在其软件产品外包装上冠以“股神2000”的名称,而内装软件的名称是“股市经典”。同时,惠斯特中心在该公司的网站主页上宣传其开发的“股市经典”时,还使用了“股神2000”和“‘股神2000'隆重上市”等字样。惠斯特中心的上述行为,使消费者将“股市经典”误认为“股神”的升级换代产品,侵犯了原告的合法权益。故诉请判令惠斯特中心:1、立即停止销售侵权产品,销售所有侵权产品的包装、装潢,并删除其网站主页上的不实宣传;2、公开赔礼道歉、消除影响并在其网站主页以及《电脑报》、《电脑商情报》上登载致歉声明;3、给原告赔偿经济损失20万元。@#
被告惠斯特中心辩称:一、“股神”商标核定使用的商品范围是第九类的“计算机硬件”,不包括“软件”。原告金洪恩公司将“股神”商标用于其开发的软件上,是擅自扩大商标使用范围。就此,我中心已向国家商标局提出撤销注册不当商标的申请;二、“股神2000”是我中心独立开发的股票分析软件,其设计和包装与金洪恩公司的“股神”软件完全不同,二者之间没有任何联系,更不是该软件的升级版;三、我中心产品的外包装上使用“股神2000”字样,是因为这是我中心另一商品“财神2000”的系列产品。这两种软件在产品包装、名称、字体方面是一致的,与金洪恩公司的“股神”软件完全不同,且在包装显著位置上注明是由北京惠斯特科技开发中心开发;四、金洪恩公司在起诉书中称“股神”产品为知名商品,与事实不符。从产品销量、市场占有率方面看,金洪恩公司均不是第一位,北京软件代理商销量排行榜也证明了这一点。基于以上理由,法院应当驳回金洪恩公司的全部诉讼请求。@#
北京市海淀区人民法院经审理查明:@#
1997年11月,原告金洪恩公司开发了“股神”软件并由清华大学出版社出版。自1998年8月至12月,金洪恩公司在《电脑报》、《工人日报》、《中国青年报》等新闻媒体上连续刊登其产品广告时,对“股神”软件也做了宣传。该软件在北京连邦软件公司(以下简称连邦公司)及其连锁专卖店均有销售。自1997年12月至1999年9月,“股神”软件在连邦公司PC软件销售分类排行榜中,在一定时期内销售量位居前列。@#
1999年4月20日,原告金洪恩公司在国家版权局进行了“股神”软件著作权登记,软件简称为“股神”。4月28日,金洪恩公司在国家工商行政管理局商标局(以下简称商标局)注册了“股神”商标,核定使用商品为第九类“计算机硬件”。12月28日,金洪恩公司取得由北京市软件和软件产品质量认证小组颁发的《北京市软件产品证书》,产品名称为“股神”。2000年4月10日,商标局受理了金洪恩公司的第2000045415号注册申请,金洪恩公司称该申请内容为将“股神”商标的核定使用范围扩大至“计算机软件”。@#
2000年3月27日,被告惠斯特中心以原告金洪恩公司的“股神”商标注册不当为由,向国家工商行政管理局商标评审委员会(以下简称商标评委会)提出撤销该注册商标的申请。5月12日,商标评委会正式受理了该申请,现尚无审查结果。@#
1999年4月6日,被告惠斯特中心将其开发的“股市经典”分析系统软件,通过签订出版合同委托电子工业出版社出版,复制数量为2万盘。自2000年年初起,惠斯特中心开始在“股市经典”软件产品的外包装上标明“‘股神2000'暨‘股市经典'千禧版”、“该软件是第二代主流炒股软件”等字样,并在《电脑报》、《电脑商情报》上刊登言行宣传“股神2000”。惠斯特中心还在该公司开设的国际互联网网站主页上宣传销售“股市经典”时,以“股神2000”作为链接标识。从该网站上下载“股市经典”升级版软件,需在主页上点击“股神2000升级版”栏目。@#
......


Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥500.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese