>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
The People's Procuratorate of Xi'an Municipality v. Wei Guoquan (Case of Larceny)
西安市人民检察院诉韦国权盗窃案
【法宝引证码】
  • Type of Dispute: Criminal-->Property Infringement
  • Legal document: Ruling
  • Judgment date: 12-26-2005
  • Procedural status: Trial at Second Instance

The People’s Procuratorate of Xi’an Municipality v. Wei Guoquan (Case of Larceny)
(Case of Larceny)
西安市人民检察院诉韦国权盗窃案

The People's Procuratorate of Xi'an Municipality v. Wei Guoquan
(Case of Larceny)@#
@#
@#
BASIC FACTS@#
Public prosecution organ: the People's Procuratorate of Xi'an Municipality, Shaanxi Province.@#
Defendant: Wei Guoquan, male, 32 years old, of the Han nationality, resides at Wuxingjie Residential Area, Xi'an City, taxi driver, and was arrested on January 26th, 2005.@#
PROCEDURAL POSTURE@#
The People's Procuratorate of Xi'an Municipality filed a public prosecution with the Intermediate People's Court of Xi'an Municipality, Shaanxi Province against Wei Guoquan for the crime of larceny.@#
It was held in the indictment that: in the early morning of April 10th, 2004, Zheng Wei (hereinafter referred to as Zheng), an employee of Shaanxi Xinhuaxin Real Estate Co., Ltd., parked his sedan, white Lexus 400 with license plate number of Shaan A-L5408 (worth RMB 373,380), at the roadway opposite to Cesar Palace, Wenyi Road, Xi'an City after he got drank, without pulling off the key and closing the windows of the car. At about 6:00 am of the same day, the defendant Wei Guoquan (a taxi driver, hereinafter referred to as Wei) drove by this place and learned about it. About an hour later, Wei passed this section again in his taxi and found that the car was still at the original place, after parking his own taxi, he got into the white Lexus. Then after finding that the key was not pulled off and nobody intervened him, Wei drove the car away and hid it at the parking lot of the PLA 323 Hospital, which was located at West Jianshe Road, Xi'an City. Afterwards, Wei used the cell phone and leather shoes and spent the US dollars that were left in the car, and hid the golf clubs that were left in the car at his sister's house. Wei had the car repaired and changed the license plate of the car. In January 2005, the victim found the stolen car, and Wei was then arrested by the public security organ. Wei's act violated the provision of Article 264 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and constituted a crime of larceny, thus the Procuratorate pleads the court to make a judgment according to law.@#
......

 

西安市人民检察院诉韦国权盗窃案@#
【裁判摘要】@#
机动车为具有特殊属性的物,所有权人必须以所有权凭证来主张自己的所有权。机动车交易只有在办理过户登记手续后,才发生所有权的转移。同时,机动车牌号登记制度也进一步增强了所有人或占有人对车辆的控制力。因此。即使机动车所有人或者占有人在离开车辆时忘记关闭车窗、车灯,将车钥匙忘记在车上,也不能认定其完全丧失对车辆的控制,并由此推定该机动车属于遗忘物。在此情形下,行为人出于非法占有的目的,以秘密窃取的方式取得该机动车辆的,应当以盗窃罪定罪处罚。@#
@#
公诉机关:陕西省西安市人民检察院。@#
被告人:韦国权,男,32岁,汉族,住西安市五星街小区,出租车司机。2005年1月26日被逮捕。@#
@#
陕西省西安市人民检察院以被告人韦国权犯盗窃罪,向陕西省西安市中级人民法院提起公诉。@#
起诉书指控:2004年4月10日凌晨,陕西新华信房地产有限公司职工郑伟因醉酒将其驾驶的牌号为陕A-L5408的白色凌志400轿车(价值人民币373380元)停放在西安市文艺路恺撒宫对面的机动车道上,钥匙未拔,车窗未关。当日6时许,被告人韦国权(系出租车司机)途经此地,发现了这一情况。约一小时后,韦国权驾车再次途经此路段,发现该车仍然停放在原处.于是将自己所驾驶的出租车放好后,潜入白色凌志车中。此时韦国权又发现车钥匙未拔,且也无人对其干涉,便将车开走,藏匿于西安市建设西路解放军三二三医院停车场。随后韦国权将存放于车中的手机、皮鞋及美元供自己使用和挥霍,将车中存放的高尔夫球杆藏匿于其姐家中。韦国权还对车辆进行了维修,更换了车牌。2005年1月,被害人发现了被盗车辆,公安机关将被告人韦国权抓获。韦国权的行为已触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百六十四条之规定,构成盗窃罪,请求依法判处。@#
公诉机关提交以下证据:@#
1.被害人郑伟陈述。主要内容是:郑伟系陕西新华信房地产有限公司的司机。2004年4月10日凌晨5时许,因醉酒,将所开公司的白色凌志400轿车(牌号为陕A-L5408)丢失,后报案。@#
2.破案经过证明。主要内容是:2005年1月11日,被害人郑伟向西安市公安局刑侦局综合处一大队报案,称在陕西省医院停车场发现其丢失的车辆。公安人员于次日晚将开车人韦国权抓获。经查验,该车就是郑伟丢失的车辆。@#
3.证人韦国旗(韦国权之兄)证言。主要内容是:被告人韦国权2004年4,5月份开了一辆白色凌志轿车,并告诉韦国旗车是一个房地产老板的,在文艺路发现该车大灯开着,窗户玻璃未关上,车钥匙也在车上,想玩一下这辆车,就把车开走藏起来了。韦国旗让韦国权赶快把车扔了,韦国权说玩几天就扔,但是一直没有扔。@#
4.车辆登记信息表及证人王黎春、郑伟证言。主要内容是:登记的车牌照号为陕A-L5408,行驶证登记车主是王黎春,但车辆产权属于王力平。@#
5.公安机关扣押及提取笔录、领条等。主要内容是:从韦国权处提取白色凌志400轿车、行驶证、手机、名片、高尔夫球杆、钱包等物。以上物品由郑伟领回。@#
6.物品鉴定结论。主要内容是:陕A-IS408白色凌志400轿车价值人民币373380元。@#
7.提取的车辆修理发票,用以证明韦国权对凌志400轿车进行修理及更换零部件的情况。@#
8.被告人韦国权的供述,对其开走涉案白色凌志400轿车的事实无异议。@#
被告人韦国权辩称:起诉书指控的事实基本正确,但部分情节有误,被告人将车开走是为了在朋友面前炫耀,并不具有非法占有的目的,还曾几次想将车归还失主,但是没有归还成。@#
韦国权的辩护人认为:一、案发当日,涉案车辆停放在机动车道,车窗未关,钥匙未拔,车主已经失去了对车辆的控制,所以该车辆是遗忘物,不是盗窃犯罪的犯罪对象;二、韦国权没有采取秘密窃取的手段将车开走,其行为不符合盗窃罪客观方面的规定;三、韦国权未改变车辆的特征,也未将车辆藏匿,没有非法占有的主观故意;四、韦国权案发后赔偿失主经济损失2万元。韦国权的行为不构成盗窃罪,请求法庭正确适用法律,罚当其罪。@#
......


Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥600.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese