>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Mo Meihuan and Cen Runming v. Cen Rongan, Cen Zhuo and Lin Yuedi (A case about disputes over inheritance)
莫美欢、岑润明诉岑荣安、岑卓、林月弟继承纠纷案
【法宝引证码】

Mo Meihuan and Cen Runming v. Cen Rongan, Cen Zhuo and Lin Yuedi (A case about disputes over inheritance)
(A case about disputes over inheritance)
莫美欢、岑润明诉岑荣安、岑卓、林月弟继承纠纷案

Mo Meihuan and Cen Runming v. Cen Rongan, Cen Zhuo and Lin Yuedi
(A case about disputes over inheritance)@#
BASIC FACTS@#
Plaintiff: Mo Meihuan, female, 28 years old, employee of the Cooperative Store of Guizhou Town, Shunde County, Guangdong Province, residing at Heping Village, Guizhou Town.@#
Attorney: Zheng Rongye, lawyer of the No.2 Law Office of Foshan.@#
Attorney: Liu Caiying, lawyer of the No. 2 Law Office of Foshan.@#
Plaintiff: Cen Runming, male, 5 years old.@#
Legal Representative: Mo Meihuan, mother of Cen Runming.@#
Defendant: Cen Rongan, male, 35 years old, self-employed worker.@#
Defendant: Cen Zhuo, male, 59 years old, farmer.@#
Defendant: Lin Yuedi, female, 56 years old, farmer.@#
The aforesaid defendants all resided at Heping Village, Guizhou Town, Shunde County, Guangdong Province.@#
Third party: Fang Changguang, male, 34 years old, employee of Xingfu Hardware Factory of Guizhou Town, Shunde County.@#
For disputes over inheritance, the plaintiffs, Mo Meihuan and Cen Runming, brought an action against the defendants, Cen Rongan, Cen Zhuo and Lin Yuedi, and the People's Court of Shunde County of Guangdong Province legally formed a collegiate bench and conducted an open trial.@#
......

 

莫美欢、岑润明诉岑荣安、岑卓、林月弟继承纠纷案@#
@#
原告:莫美欢,女,28岁,广东省顺德县桂洲镇合作商店职工。住桂洲镇和平村。@#
委托代理人:郑荣业,佛山市第二律师事务所律师。@#
委托代理人:刘财英,佛山市第二律师事务所律师。@#
原告:岑润明,男,5岁。@#
法定代理人:莫美欢,岑润明的母亲。@#
被告:岑荣安,男,35岁,个体劳动者。@#
被告:岑卓,男,59岁,农民。@#
被告:林月弟,女,56岁,农民。@#
上列被告人现均住广东省顺德县桂洲镇和平村。@#
第三人:方常光,男,34岁,顺德县桂洲镇幸福五金厂职工。@#
原告莫美欢、岑润明诉被告岑荣安、岑卓、林月弟继承纠纷案,广东省顺德县人民法院依法组成合议庭,公开进行了审理。@#
原告莫美欢诉称,她丈夫岑华安生前承包的五金木器店、安装的电话机和修建的二层楼房,是她与丈夫婚姻关系存续期间的财产,依法享有分割夫妻共同财产的权利和继承丈夫财产的权利。岑润明是岑华安的法定继承人。现被告想将这些财产,占为己有。请求依法保护她和岑润明的合法继承权。@#
被告岑荣安答辩称,五金木器店是岑卓出资,方常光出店铺,岑华安负责管理,他负责组织货源,是4人合股经营的,不是岑华安1人独自经营。电话机是他申请安装的,岑华安代付了款,代付款他已还了。原告现住的两层楼房,岑华安只出了1000元,大部分资金是岑卓和岑荣安等人出的。故请求保护其合法权益。@#
为便于判决后的执行,顺德县人民法院根据原告莫美欢的申请,依照《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法(试行)》第九十二条第一款的规定,于1987年2月11日对诉讼请求范围内的财产作出诉讼保全的裁定。@#
顺德县人民法院审理查明:原告莫美欢是被告岑荣安的弟媳,被告岑卓、林月弟的儿媳。莫美欢与岑卓之子岑华安1981年结婚,1982年生一子岑润明。1983年4月,岑华安通过岑荣安与其妻舅--本案第三人方常光协商,经当时生产队的同意,将原由方常光承包并已停业的木器店转由岑华安承包。该木器店后更名为幸福乡十队五金木器店。由岑华安独资经营,帐户、贷款、交纳管理费、税款等经济活动,均以岑华安名义进行。开业初期,岑荣安曾在短时间内协助岑华安组织过货源,后即由岑华安自行购销。在此期间,由于五金木器店生意兴隆,盈利较多, 岑华安和莫美欢在和平村建二层楼房一幢,购买了电视机、洗衣机等电器和125C摩托车1辆,并用1900元安装电话机1部于岑荣安家。 莫美欢承包的商店存有货底款1000元。1986年3月,岑华安患病,委托岑荣安代管五金木器店。同年4月30日,岑华安病故。同年5月,莫美欢要求接管丈夫遗下的五金木器店,被告岑荣安不愿交出,引起纠纷。同年6月,莫美欢向顺德县人民法院起诉,要求保护她和岑润明继承岑华安遗产的权利。@#
......


Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥300.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese