>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Luo Qian v. Aoshida Co. (A case for disputes over compensations for bodily injuries
罗倩诉奥士达公司人身损害赔偿纠纷案
【法宝引证码】

Luo Qian v. Aoshida Co. (A case for disputes over compensations for bodily injuries
(A case for disputes over compensations for bodily injuries
罗倩诉奥士达公司人身损害赔偿纠纷案

Luo Qian v. Aoshida Co.
(A case for disputes over compensations for bodily injuries)@#
@#
@#
@#
BASIC FACTS@#
Plaintiff: Luo Qian, female, 20, student, residing in the student dormitory of the department of pedagogy of the Taizhou College at Linhai, Zhejiang Province.@#
Defendant: Zhejiang Huangyan Aoshida Industrial Trading Co., Ltd., at Shilipu Village, Nancheng Street, Huangyan District, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province.@#
Legal representative: Wang Qifu, chairman of the Board of Directors of this company@#
For disputes over compensations for bodily injuries with the defendant, Zhejiang Huangyan Aoshida Industrial Trade Co., Ltd. (“Aoshida Co.”), the plaintiff, Luo Qian, brought an action in the Huangyan District People's Court of Taizhou, Zhejiang Province.@#
The plaintiff, Luo Qian, claimed that: her mother, Wu Yuhe, was a formal employee of the defendant, Aoshida Co., and the defendant had been employing temps to do the product packaging work for its busy international sales business. Since 2001, the plaintiff had used school winter and summer vacations to do the packaging work at the place of the defendant. From August 11, 2004, the No. 14 Typhoon called “Yunna” began to affect Huangyan city, but on August 12, ignoring the danger of the landing of typhoon, the defendant still required all employees to work as usual so that the foreign trade contracts could be performed on time. As affected by the typhoon, at 4 p.m. that day, the shed where the plaintiff was working suddenly collapsed, the plaintiff and her mother, Wu Yuhe and younger sister, Luo Susu and other persons were pinned under the steel-structured shed. This accident resulted in one dead and six injured. The plaintiff was hospitalized for 71 days for treatment after being injured in this accident, and cared by two persons continuously during hospitalization. After authentication by the Labor Authentication Commission of Taizhou, the injuries to the plaintiff reached the eighth degree of disability. Therefore, the plaintiff requested the court to order the defendant to compensate the plaintiff for medical treatment expenses of 8,872.5 yuan, losses for absence from work of 6,346.93 yuan, care fees of 1,420 yuan, travel fares of 100 yuan, hospitalization meal subsidies of 1,065 yuan, nutrition fees of 1,000 yuan, disability compensation of 79,080 yuan, subsequent treatment expenses of 30,000 yuan and mental distress damages of 25,000 yuan, totaling 152,884.43 yuan.@#
The plaintiff, Luo Qian submitted the following evidence:@#
1. The correspondence with the Bureau of Personnel, Labor and Social Security of Huangyan District, Taizhou, proving that the plaintiff had applied in advance to the labor authority for the determination of work-related injuries and the labor authority recommended that the plaintiff institute an action in the court for the lack of sufficient basis for the determination of work-related injuries;@#
......

 

罗倩诉奥士达公司人身损害赔偿纠纷案@#
【裁判摘要】@#
一、从事一定社会活动的民事主体,如果其从事的活动具有损害他人的危险,则该民事主体负有合理限度内的安全保障义务。不履行前述安全保障义务的,属于民法通则一百零六条规定的“不履行其他义务”,应当承担相应的民事责任。@#
二、在生产经营者的工作场所内,经生产经营者默许临时从事劳动的自然人,即使没有与生产经营者形成正式的劳动法律关系,生产经营者对该自然人仍负有合理限度内的安全保障义务。@#
@#
原告:罗倩,女,20岁,学生,住浙江省临海市台州学院师范系学生宿舍。@#
被告:浙江黄岩奥士达工贸有限公司,住所地:浙江省台州市黄岩区南城街道十里铺村。@#
法定代表人:汪奇富,该公司董事长。@#
原告罗倩因与被告浙江黄岩奥士达工贸有限公司(以下简称奥士达公司)发生人身损害赔偿纠纷,向浙江省台州市黄岩区人民法院提起诉讼。@#
原告罗倩诉称:原告的母亲吴玉荷是被告奥士达公司的职工。被告因外销业务紧张,一直雇佣临时人员从事产品包装工作。自2001年开始,原告就利用学校放寒、暑假时间在被告处从事包装工作。2004年 8月11日起,14号(云娜)台风开始影响黄岩市。被告为了外贸合约能按时履行,无视台风过境的危险,在8月12日仍组织全公司职工上班。受台风的影响,当日下午4时许,原告所在的工棚在风雨中突然倒塌,原告和母亲吴玉荷、妹妹罗素素等人被压在钢架工棚下。该事故造成一人死亡、六人受伤的结果。原告因此次事故受伤后住院治疗71天,住院期间连续二人陪护。经台州市劳动鉴定委员会鉴定,原告的伤情构成八级伤残。故请求判令被告赔偿原告医疗费8872.50元、误工费6346.93元、护理费 1420元、交通费100元、住院伙食补助费1065元、营养费1000元、残疾赔偿金 79 080元、后续治疗费30 000元、精神损害抚慰金25 000元。以上合计152 884.43元。@#
原告罗倩提交以下证据:@#
1.台州市黄岩区人事劳动社会保障局函文一份,用以证明原告已经先行向劳动部门申请工伤认定,劳动部门经审查认为认定工伤的依据不足,建议原告向法院起诉;@#
2.调解协议书和仲裁调解书各一份,用以证明和原告同时受伤的原告母亲吴玉荷及在此次事故中死亡的原告妹妹罗素素的民事赔偿事宜已处理结案;@#
3.台州市第一人民医院住院收据一份 (复印件)、输血押金收据二份、剃头费领条一份,用以证明原告受伤后住院发生医疗费59 721.59元、输血费2300元、剃头费 120元;@#
4.14号(云娜)台风受灾住院特困医疗补助申请表一份,用以证明人民政府向原告补助住院医疗费53 269.09元;@#
5.医疗诊断证明书四份,用以证明原告病情以及原告住院期间需要一人护理,出院后应休息4个月的事实;@#
6.台州市劳动鉴定委员会伤残职工劳动能力鉴定结论一份,用以证明经鉴定,原告伤情构成八级伤残;@#
7.台州市黄岩区人事劳动社会保障局对汪奇富、张品梅、黄义海所作调查笔录各一份,汪奇富笔录的主要内容是证明原告在被告厂房内因厂房倒塌致伤;张品梅、黄义海笔录的主要内容是证明原告在节假日期间在被告奥士达公司从事包装工作。@#
一审期间,2005年7月25日,原告罗倩因拆除右踝骨钢板再次在台州市第一人民医院住院治疗(共住院8天),用去医疗费4011.61元。原告向法院申请增加诉讼请求,其中医疗费增加为12 884.11元,误工费增加为8505.95元,并要求被告奥士达公司赔偿假肢安装费58 850元。残疾赔偿金增加为87 276元,总赔偿额增加至 226401.06元。@#
原告罗倩申请增加诉讼请求后补充提交以下证据:@#
8.医疗费收据二份、出院记录一份、医疗费清单一份,用以证明原告因拆除钢板用去医疗费4011.61元;@#
9.医疗诊断证明书一份,用以证明原告拆除钢板后需要休息二个月;@#
10.医疗诊断说明书一份、上海精博假肢矫形器有限公司证明一份、交通费发票四张、住宿费发票二张,用以证明原告因本案事故受伤导致右小指坏死,需要安装假肢。原告到上海安装美容手指,用去车费 580元、住宿费220元,安装的美容手指价格为1100元,使用寿命为1至2年。@#
被告奥士达公司辩称:原告罗倩与被告之间不存在劳动关系,造成原告受伤的是百年不遇的台风,属于不可抗力,不应由被告承担赔偿责任。请求驳回原告的诉讼请求。@#
被告奥士达公司提交以下证据:@#
1.黄岩南城街道办事处工作人员蔡健出具的情况说明一份,用以证明原告罗倩的妹妹罗素素在本案事故中死亡后,经有关部门调解,被告对死者亲属给予了一定补助;@#
2.母仕君、郑宏兵证言,用以证明原、被告之间不存在劳动关系。@#
经质证,被告奥士达公司对原告罗倩提供的证据3有异议,认为原告仅提供住院收据复印件,未提供正式发票,真实性不足;对原告提供的证据7有异议,认为张品梅、黄义海的证言真实性不足;对原告提供的证据8、9、10均有异议,认为上述证据系在举证期限届满后提出,不应认定。法院认为,原告提供的证据3中,虽然住院收据确系复印件,但该收据复印件和证据4能互相印证,故应予确认。被告对原告提供的证据7中张品梅、黄义海的证言有异议,但未能提交充分证据予以反驳,故对原告提供的证据7予以确认。原告提供的证据8、9虽系在举证期限届满后提出,但系举证期限届满后新发现的证据,属于新证据,且符合真实性、合法性、关联性的要求,故应予确认。原告提供的证据10未在举证期限内提交,被告不同意质证,故不予认定。@#
原告罗倩对被告奥士达公司提供的证据均有异议,认为被告提供的证据1涉及的证人未到庭作证,被告提供的证据2涉及的证人均系被告单位职工,与被告有利害关系。法院认为,被告提供的证据1涉及的证人未到庭作证,证据形式要件不足,被告提供的证据2涉及的证人系被告单位职工,与被告有利害关系,且上述证据内容与本案争议事实关联性不足,故均不予认定。@#
......


Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥700.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese