>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
No. 1 of Ten Model Cases Involving the Protection of Consumer Rights Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Meng Jian v. Guangzhou Jianmin Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd., Hainan Yangshengtang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Yangshengtang Dietary Supplements Co., Ltd. (Product liability dispute)
最高人民法院公布10起维护消费者权益典型案例之一:孟健诉广州健民医药连锁有限公司、海南养生堂药业有限公司、杭州养生堂保健品有限责任公司产品责任纠纷案
【法宝引证码】
  • Type of Dispute: Civil-->Tort ★
  • Legal document: Judgment
  • Procedural status: Trial at Second Instance
*尊敬的用户,您好!本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务,如需整篇翻译,请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com,或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com

No. 1 of Ten Model Cases Involving the Protection of Consumer Rights Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Meng Jian v. Guangzhou Jianmin Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd., Hainan Yangshengtang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Yangshengtang Dietary Supplements Co., Ltd. (Product liability dispute)
(Product liability dispute)
最高人民法院公布10起维护消费者权益典型案例之一:孟健诉广州健民医药连锁有限公司、海南养生堂药业有限公司、杭州养生堂保健品有限责任公司产品责任纠纷案
[Key Terms]
producer ; consumer ; tenfold compensation
[核心术语]
生产者;消费者;十倍赔偿
[Disputed Issues]
Where the producer uses additives in its health supplements in violation of rules, may consumers claim for compensation tenfold the price?
[争议焦点]
1.生产者在保健食品中违规使用添加剂,消费者能否要求支付价款十倍的赔偿金?
[Case Summary]
Food additive refers to the artificial or natural substances which are used in food in order to improve the quality appearance flavor or taste of the food or for the purpose of anti-rot...
[案例要旨]
食品添加剂指为改善食品品质和色、香、味以及为防腐、保鲜和加工工艺的需要而加入食品中的人工合成或者天然物质。生产者在保健食品中违规使用添加剂的行为不符合食品安全标准违规使用了添加剂的保健食品属于不安全食品...
No. 1 of Ten Model Cases Involving the Protection of Consumer Rights Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Meng Jian v. Guangzhou Jianmin Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd., Hainan Yangshengtang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Yangshengtang Dietary Supplements Co., Ltd. (Product liability dispute) 最高人民法院公布10起维护消费者权益典型案例之一:孟健诉广州健民医药连锁有限公司、海南养生堂药业有限公司、杭州养生堂保健品有限责任公司产品责任纠纷案
—Dietary supplements illegally using additives are unsafe food, and consumers are entitled to damages in the amount of ten times the price paid. --违规使用添加剂的保健食品属于不安全食品,消费者有权请求价款十倍赔偿
1. Basic Facts (一)基本案情
On July 27 and 28, 2012, Meng Jiang purchased seven cases of “Yangshengtang Collagen Powder” with the production dates of September 28, 2011, and November 5, 2011, manufactured by Hangzhou Yangshengtang Dietary Supplements Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Hangzhou Yangshengtang”) under the supervision of Hainan Yangshengtang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Hainan Yangshengtang”), from Guangzhou Jianmin Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Jianmin Company”), with a total price of 1,736 yuan. As stated on the outside of packages of all the products, the product standard code was Q/YST0011S and the ingredients included “food additives (D-Mannitol and citric acid).” All the parties involved agreed that the product involved was ordinary food, the food additive D-Mannitol in the ingredients was a misuse of food additives beyond the permitted scope, and the product involved did not meet the national food safety standards. After his claim for compensation from the food producer and dealer failed, Meng Jian filed a lawsuit with the People's Court of Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, claiming that Hainan Yangshengtang, Hangzhou Yangshengtang, and Jianmin Company should refund to him the price paid of 1,736 yuan and pay him damages in the amount of 17,360 yuan, ten times the price paid. 2012年7月27日、28日,孟健分别在广州健民医药连锁有限公司(以下简称健民公司)购得海南养生堂药业有限公司(以下简称海南养生堂公司)监制、杭州养生堂保健品有限责任公司(以下简称杭州养生堂公司)生产的“养生堂胶原蛋白粉”共7盒合计1736元,生产日期分别为2011年9月28日、2011年11月5日。产品外包装均显示产品标准号:Q/YST0011S,配料包括“食品添加剂(D-甘露糖醇、柠檬酸)”。各方当事人均确认涉案产品为普通食品,成分含有食品添加剂D-甘露糖醇,属于超范围滥用食品添加剂,不符合食品安全国家标准。孟健因向食品经营者索赔未果,遂向广东省广州市越秀区人民法院起诉,请求海南养生堂公司、杭州养生堂公司、健民公司退还货款1736元,十倍赔偿货款17360元。
...... ......

Dear visitor, you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases. If you are not a subscriber, you can pay for a document through Online Pay and read it immediately after payment.
An entity user can apply for a trial account or contact us for your purchase.
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com

 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容;
单位用户可申请试用或者来电咨询购买。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570712
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:database@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese