>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Case of Dispute over Contract of Sale of Rice Seeds Between 1,569Rice-Seeds Growing Farmers of in the Villages of Yuanba and Nule,Anyue County and the Seeds Company of Anyue County (Case of Dispute over Contract of Sale of Rice Seeds)
安岳县元坝乡、努力乡一千五百六十九户稻种经营户与安岳县种子公司水稻制种购销合同纠纷案
【法宝引证码】

Case of Dispute over Contract of Sale of Rice Seeds Between 1,569Rice-Seeds Growing Farmers of in the Villages of Yuanba and Nule,Anyue County and the Seeds Company of Anyue County (Case of Dispute over Contract of Sale of Rice Seeds)
(Case of Dispute over Contract of Sale of Rice Seeds)
安岳县元坝乡、努力乡一千五百六十九户稻种经营户与安岳县种子公司水稻制种购销合同纠纷案

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT DISPUTE CASE LIU GUOCHU VS. YE YUSHAN@#
BASIC FACTS@#
Plaintiff: Liu Guochu, Male, 52 years of age. Fine Arts staff, Administrative Office of Geleshan Cemetery of Revolutionary Martyrs, Chongqing, Sichuan.@#
Agents: Zhao Zelong, Zhang Heguang, Lawyers, the Third Law Firm, Chongqing, Sichuan.@#
Defendant: Ye Yushan, Male, 55 years of age. Professor of Fine Arts. Sichuan Fine Arts Institute.@#
Agent: Shun Shaowen, Lawyer, the First Law Firm, Chongqing, Sichuan.@#
Agent: Deng Zhangtao, Lawyer, Pingzheng Law Firm, Chongqing, Sichuan.@#
PROCEDURAL POSTURE@#
The Plaintiff Liu Guochu initiated the suit with the Chongqing Municipality Intermediate People's Court, Sichuan against the defendant Ye Yushan for encroachment upon the copyright to the Geleshan Revolutionary Martyrs Group Statues (hereinafter referred to as the Group Statues).@#
......

 

刘国础诉叶毓山侵害著作权纠纷案@#
@#
原告:刘国础,男,52岁,四川省重庆市歌乐山烈士陵园管理处美工。@#
委托代理人:赵泽隆、张和光,四川省重庆市第三律师事务所律师。@#
被告:叶毓山,男,55岁,四川美术学院教授。@#
委托代理人:孙绍文,四川省重庆市第一律师事务所律师。@#
委托代理人:邓章涛,四川省重庆市平正律师事务所律师。@#
@#
被告剂国础诉被告叶毓山侵害《歌乐山烈士群雕》著作权纠纷一案,向四川省重庆市中级人民法院提起诉讼。@#
原告刘国础诉称:一、原告与被告叶毓山共同创作的《歌乐山烈士群雕》放大稿(又称定稿),叶毓山以个人名义参展;二、全国首届城市雕塑设计方案展览会为《歌乐山烈士群雕》和原告与他人创作设计的《烈士墓沙盘》颁发的纪念铜牌,被告据为己有。被告侵害了原告的著作权,请求法院判令被告公开道歉、消除影响、赔偿损失。@#
被告叶毓山辩称:被告受《歌乐山烈士群雕》建造倡议单位的聘请,创作了《歌乐山烈士群雕》初稿,制作了《歌乐山烈士群雕》二稿。在此基础上,被告亲自参加和指导制作了放大稿,著作权应归被告享有。纪念铜牌是全国首届城市雕塑设计方案展览会发给被告创作《歌乐山烈士群雕》雕塑作品的,原告无权享有。@#
重庆市中级人民法院经公开审理查明:1981年夏天,共青团重庆市委、重庆市教育局、重庆市文化局决定,在全市少先队员中发起以集资修建《歌乐山烈士群雕》(以下简称《群雕》)的活动,并决定聘请被告叶毓山为创作设计人。1981年8月下旬,《群雕》发起单位的负责人,口头聘请叶毓山,叶毓山表示接受。1981年9月10日,在研究《群雕》的联席会上,叶毓山表示愿无偿设计《群雕》。1981年10月11日,发起单位派员到四川美术学院,正式办理了聘请叶毓山创作设计烈士群雕的有关手续。1981年11月25日,在重庆市各界代表参加的“歌乐山烈士群雕奠基典礼”仪式上,叶毓山展示了创作的30公分高的《群雕》初稿,并就创作构思的主题思想、创作过程作了说明,获得与会者的赞同。同时,展示了原告刘国础根据有关领导指示为说明《群雕》所处位置而制作的烈士墓模型。1982年3、4月间,叶毓山在《群雕》初稿基础上,又制作了一座48公分高的2稿。随后,叶毓山与刘国础根据初稿、二稿基本形态的要求,指导木工制作了《群雕》放大稿(又称定稿)骨架。这时,刘国础作为《群雕》工程办公室的工作人员,在叶毓山的指导下,参加了《群雕》泥塑放大制作和其他一些工作。叶毓山的学生余志强、郭选昌、何力平也曾对泥塑初形进行艺术造形。泥塑放大制作过程中,叶毓山经常到现场进行指导和刻画修改,并对有关方面提出的合理化建议予以采纳。对刘国础提出的一些建议,叶毓山认为符合自己创作意图和表现手法的,亦予采纳。1983年初,高2.12米的烈士群雕放大稿完成后,经分割成400余块,由叶毓山等人分别按1:4的比例放大制作成泥塑,翻成石膏,交由工人用花岗石进行1:1石刻制作。1986年11月27日,《群雕》正式落成。@#
......


Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥300.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese