>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Yang Bamin v. Zhao Xiaotao et al. (retrial case of dispute over the compensation for personal injuries in a traffic accident upon a procuratorial recommendation)
杨八民与赵小涛等交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷再审检察建议案
【法宝引证码】
*尊敬的用户,您好!本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务,如需整篇翻译,请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com,或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com

Yang Bamin v. Zhao Xiaotao et al. (retrial case of dispute over the compensation for personal injuries in a traffic accident upon a procuratorial recommendation)
(retrial case of dispute over the compensation for personal injuries in a traffic accident upon a procuratorial recommendation)
杨八民与赵小涛等交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷再审检察建议案
[Key Terms]
false lawsuits ; malicious collusion ; fabrication of facts ; criminal liability
[核心术语]
虚假诉讼;恶意串通;虚构事实;刑事责任
[Disputed Issues]
It is a false lawsuit that the parties involved in a case infringe upon lawful rights and interests of others by maliciously colluding, fabricating facts and taking advantage of civil procedures legally conducted.
[争议焦点]
案件当事人恶意串通、虚构事实、借用合法的民事程序侵害他人合法权益的,是虚假诉讼行为。
[Case Summary]
The core elements of false lawsuits contain the purpose of seeking illegal benefits by circumventing laws and regulations or national policies malicious collusion fabrication of facts taking advantage of civil procedures legally conducted and infringement of national interest...
[案例要旨]
虚假诉讼行为一般具有以规避法律、法规或国家政策谋取非法利益为目的双方当事人存在恶意串通虚构事实借用合法的民事程序...

Full-text omitted.

 

杨八民与赵小涛等交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷再审检察建议案


 ——虚假诉讼监督中监督手段的综合运用

 [监督机关和受理法院]
 监督机关:河南省尉氏县人民检察院
 受理法院:河南省尉氏县人民法院
 [基本案情]
 案件当事人(原审原告):杨八民,男,1973年2月10日生,汉族,农民。
 案件当事人(原审被告):赵小涛,男,1972年3月27日生,汉族。
 案件当事人(原审被告):尉氏县公路局。
 法定代表人:张付华。
 案件当事人(原审被告):中国人民财产保险股份有限公司尉氏支公司(简称尉氏保险公司)。
 法定代表人:苏新鹏。
 2010年9月9日,杨八民驾驶的电动车与赵小涛驾驶的豫BEP222号小型轿车追尾,造成杨八民受伤,两车不同程度损坏。经交警部门责任认定,杨八民承担此事故的主要责任,赵小涛承担事故次要责任。事故发生后,杨八民共支付医疗费8736. 66元。后经中间人杨小东等人调解,赵小涛赔付杨八民5500元。为获取更多保险赔偿款,赵小涛找到尉氏保险公司业务员许文甫帮忙,许文甫把尉氏县148法律服务所负责人周宏伟介绍给赵小涛,3人商议决定通过虚假诉讼骗取保险赔偿款。之后周宏伟未经杨八民授权,以148法律服务所名义委托开封医科法医临床司法鉴定所进行伤残鉴定。开封医科法医临床司法鉴定所医师张孝洁碍于周宏伟的请托,违背鉴定程序和操作规范,在没有对杨八民进行身体检查且另一鉴定人不知情的情况下,私自伪造了杨八民右下肢构成十级伤残的伤残鉴定意见书。2011年3月15日,周宏伟未经杨八民委托,即以杨八民的名义将赵小涛、尉氏县公路局、尉氏保险公司起诉至尉氏县人民法院,请求依法判令各被告赔偿原告医疗费、残疾赔偿金等各项费用共计33879. 2元,并指使其助手全卫华任原告杨八民的诉讼代理人,自己则担任被告赵小涛的诉讼代理人。
 [原审裁判]
 尉氏县人民法院于2011年5月12日作出(2011)尉民初字第684号民事判决书。依照《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》第16条、《中华人民共和国道路交通法》第76条、最高人民法院《关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第17条、第19条、第20条、第21条、第22条、第23条、第24条、第25条最高人民法院《关于确定民事侵权精神损害赔偿责任若干问题的解释》第8条、第10条之规定,判决如下:一、被告保险公司在“交强险”限额范围内赔偿原告杨八民医疗费、残疾赔偿金、精神抚慰金等各项费用共计29589. 2元;二、驳回原告对被告赵小涛和尉氏县公路局的诉讼请求。
 ......

Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥300.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese