>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Li Manwen v. Guoku (retrial of case regarding dispute over mining rights )
李满文诉郭库采矿权纠纷再审案
【法宝引证码】
  • Type of Dispute: Civil-->Property -->Usufruct
  • Legal document: Judgment
  • Judgment date: 04-22-2016
  • Procedural status: Retrial
*尊敬的用户,您好!本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务,如需整篇翻译,请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com,或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com

Li Manwen v. Guoku (retrial of case regarding dispute over mining rights )
(retrial of case regarding dispute over mining rights )
李满文诉郭库采矿权纠纷再审案
[Key Terms]
transfer of mining rights ; contract is invalid ; principle of bona fides ; liability ratio
[核心术语]
采矿权转让;合同无效;诚实信用原则;责任比例
[Disputed Issues]
If the contract is invalid from the beginning due to the approval procedures of mining right transfer being unable to be reissued, the parties shall respectively bear corresponding responsibilities.
[争议焦点]
因无法补办采矿权转让审批手续合同自始无效的,双方当事人应分别承担相应的责任.
[Case Summary]
Where two parties sign a transfer contract on the transfer of mining rights during the period of performance of the contract if the approval procedures for the transfer of mining rights are not handled the contract will not take effect. In addition to this...
[案例要旨]
双方当事人就采矿权转让签订转让合同在合同履行期间未办理采矿权转让审批手续合同始终未生效。且由于分井被政府部门依法关闭不可能再补办审批手续...

Full-text Omitted.

 

李满文诉郭库采矿权纠纷再审案

 最高人民法院
 民事判决书
 (2015)民申字第829号
 再审申请人(一审被告、二审被上诉人):李满文。
 委托代理人:姜小燕,北京市韬远律师事务所律师。
 委托代理人:刘尧男,河北厚正律师事务所律师。
 被申请人(一审原告、二审上诉人):郭库。
 委托代理人:雷明哲,河北世纪方舟律师事务所律师。
 再审申请人李满文因与被申请人郭库采矿权纠纷一案,不服河北省高级人民法院(2013)冀民一终字第127号民事判决,向本院申请再审。本院依法组成合议庭对本案进行了审查,现已审查终结。
 李满文申请再审称:(一)二审法院认定的郭库经营蔚县西沟煤矿开采有限责任公司(以下简称西沟煤矿)分井期间的采煤量,缺乏证据证明,适用法律错误。根据证据规则,应由原告郭库对其采煤量承担举证责任。因郭库提交证据的证明力不足,应承担举证不能的法律后果。李满文对郭库经营收益出具的抗辩证据属于优势证据,应予采纳。在双方当事人提供证据存在不一致的情况下,二审法院错误适用“自认规则”,以对郭库一方极为有利的自述内容为定案依据。二审法院遗漏了郭库新建立井的经营收益及签订《转让协议》前越界开采的收益这一事实。(二)李满文对合同无效及西沟煤矿分井被关闭不存在过错。二审法院对合同效力的认定前后矛盾。合同无效的原因为未办理批准手续,而非西沟煤矿分井关闭,分井关闭与合同无效的过错责任不具有因果关系。二审法院认定李满文申请关闭分井缺乏证据证明,关闭分井的原因系政府行为,而非李满文申请,无论李满文是否提出申请均不可能导致分井关闭。(三)李满文取得了国网冀北电力有限公司蔚县供电分公司就西沟煤矿用电量予以确认的表格以及相关证人证言作为新证据,据此核算2005年至2008年西沟煤矿分井的产煤量应为369103吨,新建立井的产煤量应为447406吨,与李满文在一、二审中提交的证人证言基本相符。李满文依据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第二百条第一项、第二项、第六项的规定申请再审。
 郭库提交意见称:(一)二审法院对郭库受让区域的煤矿产量进行了综合考量。一审判决未扣除煤矿恢复生产的时间,以及特殊时期停工的时间。李满文提交的证人证言存在明显虚假成分,与采矿证及政府文件中记载的西沟煤矿产能明显不符。(二)二审法院对无效责任的承担进行了综合考量。李满文不履行煤矿转让的报批义务导致《转让协议》无效,且其为保留自建井口而报请关闭已经转让给郭库的合法矿井,应由李满文承担全部责任。(三)李满文在协议无效中没有受到损失。李满文在报请关闭郭库受让的分井后,使其自建北立井合法化,于2008年3月与主井一道整体转让给案外人杨林,由此获利4350万元。郭库请求驳回李满文的再审申请。
 ......

Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥300.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
 
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese