>>>welcome visitor, haven't logged in. Login
Subscribe Now Contact us  
Font Size:  A A A Search “Fabao” Window English 中文 = 简体  繁体
  Favorite   DownLoad   Print
 
Liu Dahua v. Hunan Huayuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Dongfeng Motor Co., Ltd., and Dongfeng Nissan Passenger Vehicle Co. (appeal of monopoly dispute)
刘大华与湖南华源实业有限公司、东风汽车有限公司东风日产乘用车公司垄断纠纷上诉案
【法宝引证码】
  • Type of Dispute: IPR-->Monopoly
  • Legal document: Judgment
  • Procedural status: Trial at Second Instance
*尊敬的用户,您好!本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务,如需整篇翻译,请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com,或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com

Liu Dahua v. Hunan Huayuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Dongfeng Motor Co., Ltd., and Dongfeng Nissan Passenger Vehicle Co. (appeal of monopoly dispute)
(appeal of monopoly dispute)
刘大华与湖南华源实业有限公司、东风汽车有限公司东风日产乘用车公司垄断纠纷上诉案
[Key Terms]
dominant market position ; relevant market ; interchangeability
[核心术语]
市场支配地位;相关市场;可替代性
[Disputed Issues]
If a party initiates an action based on a business operator’s abuse of a dominant market position, how is the term “relevant market” to be defined?
[争议焦点]
1.当事人以经营者滥用市场支配地位提起诉讼的,应当如何界定“相关市场”?
[Case Summary]
Abusing a dominant market position is monopolistic behavior. The term “dominant market position” refers to a market position by which a business operator is able to control the price quantity or other trade terms of a product in the relevant market. Therefore in a dispute over abuse of a dominant market position...
[案例要旨]
滥用市场支配地位是垄断行为的一种所谓市场支配地位是指经营者在相关市场内具有能够控制商品价格、数量或者其他交易条件的市场地位。因此对于滥用市场支配地位纠纷必须对“相关市场”进行界定...

[Full Text]

 

[正文]

Omitted

 

刘大华与湖南华源实业有限公司、东风汽车有限公司东风日产乘用车公司垄断纠纷上诉案(湖南省高级人民法院[2012]湘高法民三终字第22号民事判决书)

 【案情摘要】刘大华系东风日产天籁牌EQ7250AC小型轿车的车主,因其车辆门锁损坏到东风汽车有限公司东风日产乘用车公司4S店(湖南华源实业有限公司)维修,车辆维修过程中,双方发生纠纷,刘大华以东风汽车有限公司东风日产乘用车公司及其4S店通过对原厂配件的垄断获取高额维修费,构成经营者滥用市场支配地位为由提起垄断诉讼。湖南省长沙市中级人民法院一审判决驳回其诉讼请求。刘大华不服,提起上诉。湖南省高级人民法院经审理认为,由于本案所诉损害事实仅涉及天籁汽车的门锁配件,且天籁汽车的原厂门锁配件与副厂门锁配件之间存在可替代性,因此,本案的“相关市场”应界定为“适用于天籁汽车的门锁配件市场”。 刘大华应当对东风汽车有限公司东风日产乘用车公司及其4S店在相关市场内具有支配地位承担举证责任,刘大华未提交证据予以证明,应承担举证不能的法律后果,其上诉主张不能成立。遂判决驳回上诉,维持原判。
 ......

Dear visitor, as a premium member of this database, you will get complete access to all content.Please go premium and get more.

1. To become a premium member, please call 400-810-8266 Ext. 171.

2. Binding to the account with access to this database.

3. Apply for a trial account.

4. To get instant access to a document, you can Pay Amount 【¥200.00】 for your single purchase.
 
您好:您现在要进入的是北大法宝英文库会员专区。
如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户;您可通过网上支付进行单篇购买,支付成功后即可立即查看本篇内容。
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail:info@chinalawinfo.com
     
     
Scan QR Code and Read on Mobile
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝en.pkulaw.cn
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. Lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials as we dynamically expand content.
 
Home | About us | Disclaimer | Chinese