The People's Procuratorate of Zhengzhou Municipality v. Huang Xin
(Case of Murder)@#
BASIC FACTS@#
Public prosecution organ: the People's Procuratorate of Zhengzhou Municipality, Henan Province@#
Defendant Huangxin, male, 31 years old, employee, dwelling on Dongming Road, Zhengzhou Municipality, Henan Province, was under surveillance of residence on October 26, 1998, and was arrested on November 3 of the same year.@#
The People's Procuratorate of Zhengzhou Municipality, Henan Province filed a public prosecution with the Intermediate People's Court of Zhengzhou Municipality, Henan Province on February 1, 2001 against Huang Xin for the crime of murder.@#
It was indicted that: On the evening of October 23, 1998, Huang and his girlfriend, Liu Yan, were playing cards in Wang Sanmei's home, who come from the same village as Liu Yan. In the course of playing cards, Huang and Liu quarreled and returned to their abode of cohabitation together. Around 9 am of the following day, Huang left his abode. Around 10: 30, Li Zhuanyun, Liu Yan's father, found Liu Yan killed when going upstairs to check the telephone line. Upon the authentication by the coroner, Liu Yan was found to be strangled and her cervix was stabbed by a single-point bayonet, therefore died from mechanic asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock. She died at around 1 am in the morning of October 24, 1998. The public security organ, on the basis of an on-the-spot investigation and interrogation of Huang as well as according to the authentication as produced by the coroner on the death clock of Liu Yan, reached the conclusion that Huang was the only person on the spot when Liu Yan was killed. According to Huang's confession and the testimony of such witnesses as Liu Chuangyun, the conclusion of authentication, the transcripts of investigation into the crime scene as well as other relevant verifications, the public prosecution organ believed that, Huang unlawfully and intentionally killed Liu Yan, which has constituted a crime of murder.@#
．．．．．．

郑州市人民检察院诉黄新故意杀人案@#
@#
公诉机关　河南省郑州市人民检察院@#
被告人　黄新，男，３１岁，公司职员，住河南省郑州市东明路。１９９８年１０月２６日被监视居住，同年１１月３日被逮捕。 @#
被告人黄新故意杀人案，由河南省郑州市人民检察院于２００１年２月１日向河南省郑州市中级人民法院提起公诉。 @#
起诉书指控：１９９８年１０月２３日晚，被告人黄新与女友刘燕在与刘燕同村的王三梅家打牌。打牌过程中，黄、刘二人发生了口角，后两人一同回到同居的住处。第二天早上９时许，黄新离开该住处。上午１０时３０分左右，刘燕父亲刘转运上楼查电话线时发现刘燕被害。经法医鉴定：刘燕系被他人扼勒颈部并用单刃刺器刺伤左颈部致机械性窒息合并失血性休克而死亡，死亡时间约为１９９８年１０月２４日凌晨１时许。公安机关经过现场调查及讯问黄新，同时根据法医对刘燕死亡时间的鉴定证实：刘燕被害的时间，只有黄新在场。根据黄新的供述、刘转运等证人证言、鉴定结论、现场勘查笔录，以及有关查证情况等证据，公诉机关认为，黄新故意非法剥夺他人生命，致刘燕死亡，其行为已构成故意杀人罪。 @#
被告人黄新否认杀害刘燕。 @#
被告人黄新的辩护人辩称：公诉机关仅依据关于刘燕死亡时间的鉴定结论，指控被告人黄新构成故意杀人罪，严重不符合“证据应当确实充分”的法定证明标准。在本案中，黄新没有故意杀害刘燕的犯罪动机；起诉书认定的刘燕死亡时间与刑事技术鉴定书记载的刘燕尸体的尸斑、角膜、瞳孔等尸体现象明显不符；死者体内检出了非黄新所留的“大量精子”，说明刘燕有可能是在黄新离开后被他人所害，刘燕被害一案应另行核实定性为强奸杀人案。 @#
法庭调查中，控辩双方对公诉机关提供的证据进行了质证： @#
１．公诉机关提供的被告人黄新的所有供述材料、刘转运、任素勉、王三梅等证人证言以及黄新当庭供述可以证明：案发前一天晚上，黄新和刘燕在王三梅家打牌时发生了口角。案发当天上午９时许，黄新离开刘燕家，并与刘燕之母任素勉有过对话。黄新离开刘燕后帮其姐去买电脑配件。上午１０时３０分左右，刘转运发现女儿刘燕被害死亡。 @#
被告人黄新辩称没有杀害刘燕，自２３日晚至次日上午９时许，他和刘燕始终在一起，他离开时刘燕还活着。辩护人认为：黄新与刘燕发生口角之事，不能证明黄新具有杀害刘燕的动机。 @#
２．公诉机关提供的郑州市公安局（９８）公法医鉴字第２４３号刑事技术鉴定书（以下简称２５３号鉴定书）“现场情况”一栏中有关刘燕被杀案现场勘查笔录记载：刘燕遇害的现场位于二楼的西侧，为一室一厅居室，门锁完好，无撬压痕迹；室内的厕所外窗开启，纱窗关闭，未见攀爬痕迹。卧室西侧、南侧窗户均为铝合金推拉窗，未见攀爬痕迹。 @#
．．．．．．